Time To Drop Song Download Costs

from the doing-a-little-economic-analysis dept

We’ve been waiting patiently for the inevitable price war to break out in the online music download store world, but so far it’s (mostly) held up due to the high fees the recording industry continues to charge. Now, Newsweek’s tech columnist Steven Levy, is pointing out that if the recording industry dropped their fees, they’d sell a lot more music. He thinks that sooner or later, the industry has to realize that they’ll do even better if prices are cheaper. He points to Real Networks’ experience (which is a bit skewed since it was a promotional plan) in dropping the price by half — but which allowed them to sell six times as many songs. If this ratio were to hold (a big “if” obviously, since it assumes people will spend more overall) then the industry would end up making a lot more money by cutting their price — but, instead, of course, they’re all looking for ways to raise prices or force people to buy bad songs to get good songs.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Time To Drop Song Download Costs”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
blairkincaide says:

No Subject Given

Can any price model really work at this point? Once people have the taste of “free” in their mouths what can be done to top that in a monetary way?

One idea would be to have a scaling price model that rewarded the “early birds” – basically let people download music very inexpensively during the initial release and then scale it up to a still cheap, but not as cheap price point. The idea would be to get as many people to be the “early adpoters” as possible, recognizing that once it’s publicly available it will become traded via P2P by some yet still purchased on music sites by others. /shrug

TJ says:

threshold of convenience

For content there is a threshold of convenience. Whether it is getting the 9/11 report printed instead of reading it online, renting or buying a DVD instead of downloading GBs of video data over broadband, or *easily* getting songs online. Buying music online can have benefits over free: No hunting through sloppily labeled files, poor quality RIPs, varied quality P2P peers, etc. When DRM significantly limits the use of downloads, or content selection is poor, or the search engine is rotten, free and pay still compete on convenience though.

Some will take free over pay even if costs per song were reduced from current rates and the pay services were awesome, mostly those who either have little $ to spend on music and those to whom time is a less valuable commodity than money. We had those people in the 70s/80s too — they taped music off the radio complete with the DJ chatter.

I too believe that song prices are still higher than than the threshold of convenience for most people. Halve the price and continue to improve the services, and far more people would be likely to take an easy means of getting the songs they want.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...