Charter Wants Verizon Treatment

from the hey,-no-fair! dept

Seeing the recent Verizon/RIAA subpoena decision the folks at cable provider Charter Communications have responded with a “what the hell?” since they just got a completely different ruling and were forced to hand over the names of 200 subscribers. So now, in light of the newer Appeals Court decision, the folks at Charter are going back to court and asking to have their decision overturned and asking the RIAA to give back the information on their 200 customers. Of course, I’m no lawyer, but I’m pretty sure the Verizon ruling is in a completely different circuit, so the Verizon ruling isn’t actually a precedent. Still, it could make a court reconsider. Either way, it sounds like these sorts of cases may take a while to settle.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Charter Wants Verizon Treatment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
1 Comment
deekayen says:


AFAIK, any legal ruling, regardless of circuit is a precident. That includes *opinions* written by respected lawyers like in Janet Reno’s office. The loophole with precidents is exactly as you suggested… they don’t have to be followed, it’s just a custom. No case is exactly the same and a judge can say a precident from another case somehow differs enough from what they’re hearing to ignore the previous ruling. If precidents were always followed, Verizon wouldn’t have immunity as the appeals court said.

Some of the formal legal training I have does give me enough background to know that Congress passed a law that says ISPs are not different than a traditional mail carrier. You can’t make your local mail guy go to court for delivering a CD with pirated software on it and Congress and Federal court said that should apply to ISPs too in 47 U.S.C. Section 230(c)(1) and Zeran v. America Online, Inc 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997) respectively.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...