Judges OK Evidence From Hacker Vigilante

from the fine-lines dept

An appeals court has ruled that the government can use evidence in a child porn case that was found by a vigilante hacker. The question was whether or not it was illegal search and seizure, and the appeals court panel ruled it wasn’t (overturning a lower court). The court ruled that this wasn’t illegal search and seizure because the search was done without prompting from the federal government, and they only found out about it afterwards. Of course, this is a fine line. Since you can now go to jail for life for malicious hacking, can the feds now turn around and charge the hacker? Or maybe he’ll just get arrested by local authorities and the FBI hangs him out to dry.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judges OK Evidence From Hacker Vigilante”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Extremely dangerious prescident...

…which will cause the case to overturned upon appeal.

Everybody has something to hide (hence the right to privacy)… and some people don’t even know that they have something to hide and/or that it is even illegal.

If you don’t agree with me, feel free to post your SSN, credit card number and your mother’s maiden name.

Anonymous Debater says:

Re: Extremely dangerious prescident...

I disagree. I have nothing to hide. I’m not going to tell you my name, credit card number, Social Security number, or my mothers’s maiden name, BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO GOOD, VALID REASON TO KNOW. It’s all out there, and a clever (and tenacious!) person can probably put all the data together, but I’m not “hiding” it, I just choose to keep it to myself, and share it only with someone who has a legitimate need to know. There is a tremendous difference between hiding something and keeping something private.

Anonymous Coward says:

Damn stupid case - very stupid indeed

The problem here is that this will lead to people planting evidence in order to send people away. Very bad precedent. illegal search and seizure? Yes, it should be. Unfortunately, our courts don’t know enought ot prove how the evidence arrived there or by what means. Who is to say the guy who “found it” did not plant it himself?

Very bad precedent and should be more carefully followed and examined. These sorts of things are very, very wrong indeed.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...