Licensed To War Drive In New Hampshire

from the clear-up-that-issue dept

Over in New Hampshire, it sounds like they’re getting ready to pass a law that would make it legal for anyone to access and use open WiFi networks. For people who do this all the time, you may be shocked to find out that it wasn’t legal. It’s actually a “wishy-washy” area of the law. Some people believe it’s legal, while others still see it as intrusion – even though the WiFi networks were left wide open and many computers are designed to automatically connect to the nearest open WiFi network. This law would clarify that the responsibility is on the owner of the WiFi network to secure it – and if they don’t, the assumption is that it was purposely left open for anyone to use. This seems like the right move. Too many people who don’t seem to understand WiFi make incredibly misleading statements about how anyone who uses an open WiFi network is a “malicious hacker”. It’s about time that people realized that open WiFi networks provide a real benefit – and in many cases (though, certainly not all…) they should be encouraged.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Licensed To War Drive In New Hampshire”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

(il)legal is in the eye of the beholder

We’ve all seen the Microsoft self-confessions of bandwidth “theft” by Balmer et. al.

The way XP behaves, I would have to classify open access points, from a legal point of view, as a “public nusiance”… if you don’t understand the concept, ask a lawyer. Microsoft even has a knowledge base article that address the subject.

My personal opinion is that open access points are a “public service” (not that they should be used with disregard, but rather that in the current political climate, it’s an important freedom to have unexpected and difficult to monitor/tap means of communication). No, I’m not worried about terrorists having this freedom… We couldn’t catch them before… what makes you think we won’t catch anyone other than “stupid” terrorists with TIA?

As far as access point hardware makers go, I would have to say the the industry has done a miserable job. Security is the single biggest stumbing block to even more wide spread adoption of wireless technologies. There’s a fairly simple solution that everyone seems to be completely missing. Build wireless access points with two wired ports. One for the way to the internet and one for your internal network. Make default policy on the access point to allow wireless access through to the internet, but block access wireless access to the “internal”
network by default. This would reduce the imediate danger of deploying a wireless access point for the average consumer.

Why Microsoft didn’t cease upon the opportunity to leverage their passport authentication in their wireless access point is beyond me. Probably has a lot to do with wireless not being their core compentency.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...