A Curmudgeon's Guide To Privacy

from the avoid-telling-anyone-anything dept

Yesterday I was on the phone with a company that had sold me something. I was confused because they had charged my credit card 3 months after the purchase. After we worked out what had happened, the guy asked for my email address… for no clear reason. I was surprised and almost gave it to him, when I realized this company had no reason to know my email, and politely told him I preferred not to give it out. David Holtzman from Network Solutions sounds like he’s even more afraid of giving out any information (I usually give in once it gets annoying) and has a guide to protecting your digital privacy. Of course, even following the strategies he outlines (things like pay cash upfront, don’t use membership cards, and never use wireless devices), I would imagine most people have very little real privacy. Most of our privacy these days (unfortunately) comes from obscurity. There’s simply too much data for anyone to be too interested in your specific data (until, of course, you do something wrong).

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “A Curmudgeon's Guide To Privacy”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mike (profile) says:

Re: No Subject Given

I used to do this and it’s a complete waste of time. Because, down the road, when you need to login or give them your email address again I always forget which one I gave them. It’s more of a pain than anything else. Besides, my problem wasn’t what they would do with the email address, but why they wanted it in the first place.

David H. Holtzman (user link) says:

Re: Re: No Subject Given

It’s not really privacy,per se. The downside is much worse. Privacy sounds like a bunch of annoying phone calls at dinner or a bigger bunch of junk mail to throw away. The problem is that they’re creating key fields for large scale federations of data bases. For instance, Bank of America’s privacy statement reserves their right to link your transactional information to information in other holding companies that they have. When you look at the breadth of today’s multinational corporation, that’s pretty open-ended. Every extra bit of information means a “join” somewhere down the road and this allows creation of metainformation about you. Are you a “spendthrift”, do you impulse buy cyclically, etc. I’m more worried about this kind of invisible categorization.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...