Pop Unders Patented

from the well,-that's-good-and-bad... dept

It seems that someone’s filed a patent for those annoying pop-under ads and isn’t even waiting for the patent to be approved. Instead, they’re planning on going after anyone who’s using pop unders to try to drum up some licensing revenue (thanks to a new law concerning patents that lets you go after offenders if you publish the patent). One would hope, of course, that the patent office never approves such a silly patent – but it does make you wonder if license fees might make some companies slow down their pop under onslaught.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Pop Unders Patented”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
4 Comments
Lee says:

I wish I had thought of that

I wish I had thought of that.

Not that I use pop unders, I hate them. However, if I held the patent on pop unders I could go after the people who do use them, I would consider it a public service to stop the practice.

I wonder if anyone has patented spam.

All seriousness aside, trying to patent pop unders this late in the game is a waste of time.

Duffman says:

Re: No Subject Given

That’s not what happens here. First you complain that some articles are off topic, then you copmain that articles that are relevant have been posted somewhere else. Do you also complain if both NBC and ABC news broadcast the same story? If something is important or noticable, then it will probably be reflected in the fact that multiple sites will post it. Mike’s posted many articles before slashdot has picked up on them. And both have lots of articles on their own. Deal with it.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: Re: No Subject Given

What’s funny, of course, is that I didn’t find this at Slashdot, and now that I went and checked out the /. story they’ve even linked to a different article than I did. Of course, if you also count up the number of times stories show up here before /., I think we’re leading the way by quite a bit. I wonder if this kid goes to /. and complains when they have the same stories we do.

Anyway, it was just a troll. Thanks for the support Duffman, but I’m sure it will make no difference.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...