Raising Venture Capital These Days

from the helps-to-have-done-it-before dept

The Washington Post is running a story where they followed around an entrepreneur to see just how difficult it is to raise money for a brand new startup these days. Turns out, based on this article, it’s not difficult at all. All you need to do is have built a successful startup before which you sold off for millions of dollars making the same investors who invested in you last time, willing to dump their latest cash into whatever you come up with this time. Nothing to it. I’m surprised everyone doesn’t do it that way. Honestly, I think this is a terrible article. I think it’s a useless example of what it’s really like to raise money, since they don’t show him actually being tested at all. If you want to actually try to raise money from a venture capitalist (especially in today’s market) don’t expect it to be anything like what’s described in that article.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Raising Venture Capital These Days”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

I do know

I’ve been working with VCs for quite a while, all during the current downturn. And I can tell you, that each VC has their own particular excuse about why a company isn’t worth investing in — usually because they can’t come in, pick up broken pieces and turn them around for a quick return, which really is today’s M.O.

The situation is the way it has always been: it’s who you know. That is the path to funding. That’s what the article suggests, and it’s basically the truth.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: I do know

Oh, it’s always been about who you know… even well before the downturn. However, the idea that you’ll just meet with three venture capitalists (even if they know you) and they’ll just agree to give you money for a very vague idea is really unlikely. Even worse, the fact that the first VC gave the guy $250,000 to tide him over while he raised the rest… that very very rarely happens. Even if you know the VCs. I’m just amazed that the article was indicating that this was a “tough” process in how he raised money.

I’ve been hearing stories about people who have been very successful, and who have great ideas, and who know plenty of VCs getting turned down or getting pushed off for months on end. I think the article is quite misleading.

Dale Gardner says:

Mile Wide, Inch Deep

The article misses several important facts – leaving the conclusion that pv basically walked around and had everyone punch his ticket so he could collect the $3 million. The article does a disservice both to readers, who are left with an inacurate perception of what it takes to get funded, and to pv and his team. The article tends to understate the amount of work that pv himself put into the effort, minimizes the efforts of his staff, and completely ignores several other people who worked on the project.

That said, if you’re looking to the Post business section for your dose of real world, slice of life journalism – you’re probably looking in the wrong spot.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...