Virtual Baggage, Real Bucks

from the people-need-help dept

Okay, some people really need to get a life. Here’s yet another article about people selling their online game characters for serious money. They mostly talk about EverQuest (more commonly known as EverCrack) characters and equipment. It seems that some people are actually making a living selling equipment and characters to people for real money (and sometimes lots of it). Sony has tried to prevent EverQuest sales, but it doesn’t seem like they’re doing a very good job. Other gaming companies don’t care as much. Maybe I should give up this whole Techdirt thing and play online video games for fun and for profit.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Virtual Baggage, Real Bucks”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mark says:


It continues to amaze me that people don’t understand that this is good safe entertainment. People have fun playing this game, which is no different than playing golf. You say people need to get a life, but how is this activity any different than selling used golf clubs? Some like to golf, some like to play EQ. The judgements passed on people for choosing their private activities is narrow minded and inappropriate. If you don’t want to buy a “virtual” sword, then don’t. If someone else feels that this will enhance their fun and playing ability, then why not let them do so without derision? I don’t image that those players (mostly kids) deride you for spending money on golf clubs.

ScooterBoy says:

Re: Riposte

I agree completely with Mark — in fact, I think it’s really awesome to see that people are actually willing to pay real money for virtual things — while it can be argued that the value in these “virtual” objects is completely superficial, can’t it be compared to the “value” created designer brands when generics serve the same practical purpose?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...