Associated Press Tries To DRM The News

from the good-luck-with-that dept

DRM has failed in almost every instance it's been tried. Not only does it fail to actually prevent copying, it tends to piss off legitimate users and limit value rather than enhance it. And yet... people keep trying. But, honestly, I can't think of anything as pointless as the latest move from the Associated Press which appears to be an attempt to DRM the news. That's not what they call it, but that's what it sounds like:
The Associated Press Board of Directors today directed The Associated Press to create a news registry that will tag and track all AP content online to assure compliance with terms of use. The system will register key identifying information about each piece of content that AP distributes as well as the terms of use of that content, and employ a built-in beacon to notify AP about how the content is used....

The registry will employ a microformat for news developed by AP and which was endorsed two weeks ago by the Media Standards Trust, a London-based nonprofit research and development organization that has called on news organizations to adopt consistent news formats for online content. The microformat will essentially encapsulate AP and member content in an informational "wrapper" that includes a digital permissions framework that lets publishers specify how their content is to be used online and which also supplies the critical information needed to track and monitor its usage.
Hopefully I haven't "violated" that rule by quoting the section above. It really does sound like the mythical dreams of DRM that the software industry discussed two decades ago and the music industry discussed a decade ago. Neither one worked -- and both of those were (theoretically) a lot more "protectable" than news. Honestly, it's difficult to think of anything quite this useless:
  1. It won't work. It physically can't work. News is news. You can't put any real DRM on it, because it's so easy to copy text and remove any sort of "registry" tags.
  2. It removes value. Nothing in this move increases the value of the AP's content to anyone. It does the opposite. It significantly limits the value, and for those who actually want to help promote the content, it now gives you extra incentives not to do so.
  3. It's a waste of AP resources. At a time when the AP should be focusing on looking for ways to add value to create a better business model, it's now about to throw away money, time and staff on putting together a DRM for news that doesn't work? Talk about screwed up priorities.
This has been said before (multiple times) but you don't rescue your business model by "protecting" against what people want to do. You don't rescue your business model by wasting resources trying to hold back what people want to do. You rescue your business by providing more value and figuring out a way to monetize that value. Putting bogus DRM on news does none of that. It only hastens failure.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Ima Fish (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:06am

    "Associated Press Tries To DRM The News"

    Through no fault or your own, this site is becoming the Onion of IP crap. Unfortunately, unlike the Onion, it's not satire.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:16am

    nonsense

    "you don't rescue your business model by 'protecting' against what people want to do"

    um... wrong? if someone wants to do something and you are in position to prohibit them from doing so, you can make them pay you to not prohibit them. the key is to find the price point at which they'll still pay you to not prohibit them. the better argument is that DRM is a laughably ineffective tool at enforcing these prohibitions.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Dustin, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:16am

    "Hopefully I haven't "violated" that rule by quoting the section above."

    According to the AP, you probably have. Nuts, isn't it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:29am

    Re: nonsense

    Er, do you not understand the word "rescue"?

    If your business is failing, making your product less appealing will do nothing to save you. Ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:32am

    Bring it ON!

    "Putting bogus DRM on news does none of that. It only hastens failure."

    The sooner the 'Asshat Posse' (AP) rides off into the bankruptcy sunset, the better.

    The AP looks like damage to the internet and news is being routed around it just fine thank you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:32am

    Re: nonsense

    "if someone wants to do something and you are in position to prohibit them from doing so, you can make them pay you to not prohibit them."

    Seriously, how does this not sound like an endorsement for a protection racket? They want to do business. You can make them pay or prohibit them from doing so.

    Look, this is a bad neighborhood, and things sometimes...happen...here. For a small fee, we can watch your store, make sure it's safe, really take care of ya, you know?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:43am

    Re: Re: nonsense

    "Seriously, how does this not sound like an endorsement for a protection racket?"

    Hey! I have a patent on that business model!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:49am

    Re: nonsense

    Spreading news is human nature. There is no good way to stop that. The best way would be to lead them in the correct direction. It's an subtle and sometimes complex way to do things, but I've found that a subtle approach (incentives, better product) works better and lasts longer than the "smack to the face" direct approach (DRM, Lawsuits). Plus, if done right, it makes you look better than when you started.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 8:59am

    A.P. Cracks Down on Unpaid Use of Articles on Web

    Some more verbiage here.
    New York Times

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:05am

    Re: nonsense

    "the key is to find the price point at which they'll still pay you to not prohibit them."

    You're assuming that such a price point exists and is greater than zero.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:08am

    Biggest. Analog hole. Ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:08am

    Human Problem Solving Technique

    (this I learned from watching a two-year old--yet it still holds true.)

    1. Piss and cry and wait for somebody else to solve your problem.

    2. Try several non-working solutions to your problem.

    3. Knuckle down and adjust, solve problem.

    This appears to be exactly what AP is doing...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    richard, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:27am

    Green Dam

    Hey AP, I'd bet China has some really effective software for what you're trying to do. I'm sure they would copyleft you a license.

    it's somewhat ironic that an industry that's been the beneficiary of the first amendment so often is now trying to bottle even the interpretation of it's content.

    They should just get a patent on "a procedure or methodology to propagate information of past events directly to carbon based lifeforms within 24 hours"

    Then they could just demand "royalties".

    one other thing I've noticed, There seems to be a trend where someone posts a flame the second that a new entry hits TD. I usually remove the "crap" blogs from my RSS reader. We all know sleaze ball Lawyers LOVE them some IP MMMMmm Mmm. Smells like litigation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:29am

    The Next Step

    "Associated Press Tries To DRM The News"

    I'm really awaiting the brain stem chips so they can just go ahead and DRM our thoughts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Jiminy Cricket (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:29am

    Re: A.P. Cracks Down on Unpaid Use of Articles on Web

    “If someone can build multibillion-dollar businesses out of keywords, we can build multihundred-million businesses out of headlines, and we’re going to do that,” Mr.[Tom] Curley, [A.P.’s president and chief executive] said. The goal, he said, was not to have less use of the news articles, but to be paid for any use.
    I'm going to let that breathe for a minute......
    OK, nice goal, now please proceed directly to fail. Good luck with staying solvent.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Michael Kohne, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:42am

    You can't win...

    If you aren't playing to win. If you just try to hold position, you'll inevitably be pushed back.

    The only way for the AP to remain relevant is to move forward. Any other course of action is equivalent to giving up and going home.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 9:42am

    When your sooooper-genius new business model...

    ...can be neatly undercut by one line of Perl, you're in trouble.

    Seriously, didn't they bother to ask a qualified technical person their opinion of this new "microformat"?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:01am

    Does this mean cut-and-paste is now illegal under the DMCA? Will browsers be forced to "enforce" the digitial rights of news articles? And what about the analog hole (news article to eyes, eyes to brain, brain to hands, hands to keyboard, keyboad to computer) that allows a person to copy the news article manually?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:04am

    Re: Human Problem Solving Technique

    "2. Try several non-working solutions to your problem.

    3. Knuckle down and adjust, solve problem.

    This appears to be exactly what AP is doing..."

    Does it? I think they're still at stage two of your scheme.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    ugh, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:04am

    Is anyone else tired of hearing the "business model" argument out of techdirt in every single article?

    I do think what AP is doing will fail, but I swear every TD article I read says "fix your business model". Its not that easy. Not trolling, just an observation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:06am

    Re: nonsense

    In this case, the price point is zero.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Rose M. Welch, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:08am

    Re:

    That's because so many companies in so many industries need to fix their business model, mainly to allow for the Internet.

    Also, it's not an 'article', it's a 'blog'. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:12am

    Wow... It's funny, Google charges it's users nothing for software that I can guarantee the AP uses frequently, but you don't hear Google complaining. They made giving something away a business that makes tons of money. Provide content that people want to read and make it easy enough for them to get to. Hulu understood this and started making money so big content slammed the door down on them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    interval, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:19am

    Re:

    I disagree. 1) Its not satire. Its real life. 2) No one else except Mike is reporting on this nonsense, and I think it needs to be exposed. If Mike were trying to be the Onion of IP law (or some other bizarre notion) you might have a point. I guess you're just tired of reading about pervasive problem over and over again. I agree; its repetitive. But that's the problem. It seems like any business that is in the business of information has some extreme need to bend ip law to give it control over that information; and the whole mess is just silly. This crap needs to be brought out into the light until people see how stupid it is. The constant bending of IP law really bothers me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    anymouse (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:46am

    Re the Onion comment and response

    I don't think the comment was intended to be derogatory towards TechDirt, but to point out how ridiculous some of these 'real' issues are, by comparing them to the Onion's Satire. Some of the ideas these 'industry types' come up with are just so far out there that you almost hope that it is satire, but then they continue to push their stupid ideas on the rest of the world and we realize that they were actually serious....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    NotAnOnion, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 10:46am

    Re: Re:

    I believe what he meant is that some of the stories are so ridiculous that they could be satire. Sadly, they are not.

    I do laugh at a lot of these stories, much like the onion. The failure is quite hilarious in some cases.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:02am

    Re: nonsense

    um... wrong? if someone wants to do something and you are in position to prohibit them from doing so, you can make them pay you to not prohibit them.

    right. that has worked out fantastically well for the music, movie, software and video game industries.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    eric (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:05am

    Ive always wondered

    what would happen if google just stopped linking to any of the the publications that dont want them to. I imagine if they did, those sites advertising revenue would drop dramaticly. Sometimes you just have to prove your point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:11am

    Re: Re: Human Problem Solving Technique

    Yes, yes exactly.

    Obviously the AP is following the same approach to problem solving that 2 year olds do.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Me, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:20am

    Re: Re:

    Did you even read what Fish wrote or just blindly and ignorantly jump all over him like most here do? I'm betting number two.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:33am

    Re: Re:

    If you dig deep enough into almost any system, you can find failure points. What makes techdirt often a monotonous drone of IP problems is that there is rarely an upside discussion anywhere.

    Example, while a handful of oddball patents get approved each year, hundreds (and thousands) of good and valid ones also make it through the process. Your heart surgeon would be praised for having that level of success.

    If you want to look hard enough, you can always find issues, but it doesn't mean the system is broken, just that someone is way too focused on a very, very small part of a much larger picture. So when Mike suggests that we roll back Copyright or get rid of patents, he is dismissing the bigger picture based on only what he can see right in front of his nose, pressed up against a failure point.

    Balance is something that is sorely lacking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    interval, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 11:58am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Yeah, I'm new here. I've never posted here before so I don't know what I'm doing and blah blah blah...

    You ever stare into the cold, blinking cursor of a monitor connected to the 'net and just get every human nuance that every author writes in a blog? I'm betting, like me, a human, probably not. So f'off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 12:24pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    If you dig deep enough into almost any system, you can find failure points. What makes techdirt often a monotonous drone of IP problems is that there is rarely an upside discussion anywhere.

    Heh. You don't get far by making stuff up. A rather large % of the posts are on folks who are making stuff work.

    To say there's rarely an upside discussion is perhaps your own observer bias from someone who wants to make us look bad. We spend a lot of time highlight the positives.

    If you want to look hard enough, you can always find issues, but it doesn't mean the system is broken, just that someone is way too focused on a very, very small part of a much larger picture.

    Heh. Again, making stuff up doesn't get you very far. We've highlighted at least a dozen studies that looked at the overall system and showed that it is very, very broken across the board.

    Balance is something that is sorely lacking.

    It ain't about balance. It's about reality!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    chris (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 1:10pm

    Re: Human Problem Solving Technique

    (this I learned from watching a two-year old--yet it still holds true.)

    it's a good thing that two year olds can't file lawsuits and bribe politicians.

    there will be much lobbying and lawyering before this is settled.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 1:20pm

    Re: Re: nonsense

    i suspect you're trying to be sarcastic, but you're only backing up my point. an xbox 120 gb hard drive is still $120, when a 1tb hard drive is under $80. MS charges you this ridiculously huge markup because they can and do prohibit you from installing a different hard drive. unlike DRM, MS's restriction is very enforceable. you can't use an unlocked hard drive online, which provides most of the system's value. as i said above, the key is to ENFORCING the prohibition, and simple DRM is inadequate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    Sneeje (profile), Jul 24th, 2009 @ 4:45pm

    Re:

    So... how about some constructive criticism or suggestions on what you'd like to see instead of pointless vitriol? Or, stop reading perhaps?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 24th, 2009 @ 6:22pm

    Re:

    dude your fish is scary

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Kirk, Jul 25th, 2009 @ 2:47pm

    How is this considered DRM?

    I've followed the links referenced in this article and I don't see how you can make the claim that AP is planning to use DRM on its content. Instead, it appears that AP will be using microformats and metadata to express rights information. That's entirely different from DRM. It's no different than bloggers using the machine readable Creative Commons license to express that CC rights have been applied to a blog post.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending AP. There are some very real Fair Use issues at stake here. But to confuse those issues by bringing DRM into the discussion only clouds the issue. You might get more links/attention by taking this approach, but you damage your credibility in the process.

    Further, as microformats become more widespread you'll find yourself in the interesting position of having to use and/or defend the technology that you've characterized as being a form of DRM. Good luck with that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    lulz, Aug 21st, 2009 @ 4:14am

    Re: Re:

    http://www.techdirt.com/ article .php?sid=20090723/1858235640&threaded=true&sp=1#comments

    :)

    an article in a blog.. what a concept.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Tall sheepskin boots, Dec 12th, 2010 @ 5:45am

    "http://www.tallsheepskinboots.net"

    Why does AP want to keep their news to themselves? They should not put the news online if they don't want other people to tag it. Tall Sheepskin Boots

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This