RSS
Long Tail Not Dead Yet: eMusic Says It's Alive And Well
from the premature-death dept
There have been a series of criticisms to Chris Anderson's concept of "The Long Tail" lately. While most don't hold up under scrutiny, a few have made some good points that don't actually go against the long tail concept, but may adjust some of how people understand it. Of course, people love to jump and declare something completely dead, so there have been a few stories making the rounds claiming that the long tail era has been disproved. Somehow, however, when evidence to the contrary shows up, it doesn't get nearly as much attention. eMusic has published a report noting that, indeed, their own sales show a pretty clear long tail distribution, with at least 75% of all of the music they stocked being sold at least once in 2008. Once again, though, it comes down to the filters. eMusic has some good features (they could be better, honestly) to help people find new and obscure music -- and that helps spread interest to new acts. So, once again, it appears that the long tail is still very much alive, but it does still depend on the filters being used.
12 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- TuneCore: RIAA Has Become A Part Of The Problem For Artists
- OK Go Shows, Once Again, How Content Is Advertising... And How There Are Many Revenue Streams For Musicians
- Is Using A Piece Of Existing Music In A Film To Underline An Emotion 'Rape' - Or Just The Way Cinema Works?
- As eMusic Embraces Major Labels, Its Indie Core Is Leaving
- eMusic: Prices Went Up, But Artists Aren't Seeing Any Of That Cash
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
The catalogue goes from strength to strength as long as you aren't looking for mainstream chart material, and I've discovered many new acts there (Bonobo being my current favourite download this month). Long may they continue :)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Besides, that has nothing to do with the long tail. The basic idea of the long tail is that while most purchases typically take place within a few months of an album's release, sales can continue for a long time further down the line. The fact that a store with over 4 million tracks with content reaching back from the early part of last century to recent releases is still managing to sell most of its content is proof of the long tail.
Albums that would have been out of print years ago on CD and vinyl are still selling - that's the point.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It raises the question of how far the subscription model shapes users' activity and their propensity to get music they might otherwise not consider: because credits reset to zero every month, there is a strong incentive to use them for something. There may be something in that - though of course if people were really averse to experimentation, they might well just choose no to continue with emusic in the first place.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Long tail or odd distribution
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'll tell you what IS dead though. "Free"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Long tail or odd distribution
1. Taylor Swift - Taylor Swift
2. Akon - Black President
3. Joan Jett & The Blackhearts - I Love Rock & Roll
4. Lil' Wayne - American Dreams
5. Bon Iver - Blood Bank
While some of these seem to be the result of people looking for mainstream material that's not there and settling for older names they recognise, I only see one "indie" new release. Of my own downloads this month, only one album is a new addition this month and two are over 10 years old. I also hate "indie rock" so can vouch that the discount element is only part of the story.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
my emusic experience
i also discovered the vitamin string quartet thru emusic, and got classical string versions of a lot of popular songs.
but if i forgot to buy tracks for a month, then i lost $20.
for a while i set calendar reminders but instead i decided to just let it go.
if you have to pay by the track, i wish you could just bank unused credits.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
saying that 75% of all music "bought" was purchased at least once is a bit misleading when you note that they put their users on monthly plans - I would be interested to see how much of that music was bought at the very end of the month, just trying to use up all of their credits for the given month. I think the possibility of this might skew that stat just a bit.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You could also make the counter argument - how many tracks were bought by users buying booster packs (which cost more per track than the basic subs)?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Labels are dying
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment