Netflix Claims Its Business Model Is Patented, Sues Blockbuster

from the oh-come-on dept

All of the evidence so far has shown that Netflix has consistently beaten Blockbuster in the marketplace by offering a more compelling product to many people. Blockbuster keeps trying to get back into it, but hasn't been able to build up nearly the same user base -- despite its name recognition and ubiquitous stores. With that in mind, it's disappointing to see Netflix now resort to yanking out their business model patents and trying to force Blockbuster out of the online rental business. Here's a perfect example where that patent isn't at all needed to incent innovation. The market is doing a perfectly good job. The only thing this patent serves to do is reduce competition, thereby reducing continued innovation in that market. In the meantime, both companies will now waste money on fighting this out in court or coming to some sort of monetary settlement -- when both firms would be better served putting that money into improving what they offer customers.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:17pm

    Yea! First Post. Go get em boys. Maybe you can sue em if they don't slow their mailings down to fast returners also!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    J, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:43pm

    Re:

    how do you know that they do that?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Mike, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:45pm

    Sue Happy America

    Am I the only one that thinks that being #1 in a competative market says more than being #1 in a market of only one?

    If this court battle sticks then the person/company that had the first monetary transaction over the internet should in turn be able to sue any company who has, is or ever had an e-business for copying their idea. Damn the luck, it would probably be microsoft!

    Aaaarrrrggghhhh, gotta love America!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    StnkBll, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:47pm

    You Have Got to be Kidding Me

    Well, I happen to like Blockbuster as I get more for my money (free in store rentals) AND I get my movies sent quickly without restrictions (who knows if that will change).

    Sounds like Netflix doesn't like the competition or a company that is providing a better product despite a smaller customer base.

    Like the orginal post stated it would more beneficial for both companies to work on improving their offerings than battling in court.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Jordan Amdahl, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:48pm

    Patent Law

    You haven't provided enough evidence to show that patent law is not working in this case. The point of patent law is to encourage creation of new productions by giving inventors exclusive rights to their inventions. It is a given that after the product is invented, patent law restricts competition. The point is that the product might not have been invented in the first place if the inventor didn't know that he would have the right to what he creates. In order to actually form an argument against patent law in this case, you need to show two things:
    1. Inventor had sufficient incentive to invent the product/service without patent law.
    2. Competition is restricted after product/service is invented due to patent law.

    Don't take this as a defense of patent law; its economic justification is not entirely sound. I just mean to point out that the argument against it you presented is not complete.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    "Back-up Master", Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:53pm

    Re: Re:Backups are good

    Ever tried it? If you had then you would know it is true.....and it sucks!! To get around it try upgrading your membership to the next level for a week or so, then downgrade. Tricks the system....untill they read this :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    qyiet, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:56pm

    Say what?

    You can patent a business model?



    Wow.. your patent system is *messed* up.. I hope ours is better

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 8:57pm

    Its the competition that led Netflix to this "innovation". Netflix isnt concerned with "what it says to be #1", they are concerned with $$, as most traditional companies are (hence M$)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    RTL, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 9:12pm

    Re: You Have Got to be Kidding Me

    I used to like BB, too. But they just implemented a rate hike. I was one of the first to join BB when they first started out, but they have just alienated me with their rate hike. I am canceling and looking to Netflix or someone else. They had a good thing going and they had to get greedy. It never fails.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 9:26pm

    Why rent?

    When you can download for free and burn your own copy. After all, anyone complaining about Netflix throttling arrival time is already burning illegal copies. So, why not just download and do it all for free? Fuck corporations and associations!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Hickory420, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 9:30pm

    Blah

    Blockbuster SUCKS... Netflix RULES! :-D

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Geekster, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 9:39pm

    Voice of Experience

    I've used both BB and Netflix, and Netflix's service is entirely superior to BlockBuster's wannabe copy. Better DVD's, faster service, lower price, great customer service..... Love Netflix!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Craig, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:05pm

    Abuse of a bad patent system

    Like we needed further evidence that the US patent system no longer serves its originally intended purpose. Shame on Netflix, but shame on the US government even more for not fixing what is obviously broken.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:05pm

    Maybe Gamfly Next

    Are patents are becoming like the workmans Unions. Useless. Unions aren't needed as most workers have more rights than they disserve. Software patents only stifle creativity as there is usually one right way to do somthing. If whoever developed the idea of ajax (well naming and combining the tech) patented it, no one would use it and this many new web 2.0 sites wouldn't exist as most start out with low revenue. All corporations seek greed, to help drive stocks because we all know our economy is reflected in our stock market (yeah right)....They'll probably be suing gamefly next for offering online video game rentals...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:05pm

    Patent Infringement?

    Ok so Netflix busts Blockbuster for online Rentals, so in turn Blockbuster busts Netflix, WestCoast Video and every mom and pop rental place for renting videos as a infringement on there patented business model. IE: Renting Videos ..... HRM ....

    And FYI to the AC, not everyone with fast returns pirates movies

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:15pm

    Re: Patent Law

    The point is that the product might not have been invented in the first place if the inventor didn't know that he would have the right to what he creates.

    You don't think Netflix would have come along if they couldn't have received patent protection? I find that incredibly difficult to believe.

    The point of patent law is to encourage creation of new productions by giving inventors exclusive rights to their inventions.

    No, this is false. The point of patent law, as stated in the Constitution, is to promote the progress of useful arts and science.

    It seems ridiculous that Netflix only chose this business model because it was patentable. What's much more likely is they saw an opportunity for a market and took it. The patent came after the fact, and was not needed in any way to incent the development of the model. Keeping the competition out again slows innovation in this market by giving Netflix a monopoly on it for the term of the patent.

    The patent also does little public service in "revealing" its contents (the other side of the patent coin), since the business model is pretty clear for anyone who looks at their business.

    So, yeah, I think it's pretty clear that this is a case of the patent system slowing innovation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Tom, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:16pm

    Re: Re:

    Netflix has admitted that they slow down customers that are a little too, shall we say, enthusiastic about their service.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 10:22pm

    Re: Re: Patent Law

    "No, this is false. The point of patent law, as stated in the Constitution, is to promote the progress of useful arts and science. "

    Barring a minor typo due to rewriting the phrase (products instead of productions...) that is what I said. Patents are supposed to encourage progress. Distribution models can fall under the protection of patents under some valid (but not necessarily correct) interpretations.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Malicah, Apr 4th, 2006 @ 11:08pm

    Netflix Vs. Blockbuster

    This if for those arguing over whether Netflix or Blockbuster offers a better online rental service.

    I have used both services here recently and I think the difference is very simple....

    Both of them cost the same, 17.99 a month for 3 DVD's at a time... but BlockBuster gives coupons for up to 4 free In-Store rentals a month. thus making blockbuster the better deal.

    On the other hand though Netflix's system is far superior; Easier to search movies, better movie information, better movie suggestions, and much more. I also never had a problem with Netflix sending the wrong movie, where I did with Blockbuster. I also feel Netflix DVD's are in better condition, although I haven't had a problem with a DVD from either company.

    So it comes down to.... Do you want quality (Netflix) or Quantity (Blockbuster). I prefer blockbuster as I like the better deal... and plus blockbuster is supposed to be redoing their interface... so maybe it will be comparable or better then Netflix's.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Sick of this ----, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 12:52am

    Waste of the justice system's time

    Can we please find more ways to waste the time of the justice system? How much more money does Netflix expect to make off this? I mean... I dunno. I can't find the right words that wouldn't get this post removed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 1:15am

    couple thoughts

    1. If the patent really says something like "subscribers are not penalized for late movies," why doesn't blockbuster just enforce a year long rental duration? Some of the technicallities can be circumvented pretty easily.

    2. All the problems BB has with wrong movies and stuff makes me wonder if Netflix doesn't reimburse it's employees for BB and have them all swap DVD's and scratch them up.... wouldn't surprise me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Eddie F, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 1:58am

    NetFlix needs a second opinion

    Things are working as they should. A law firm fooled NetFlix into hiring them to file a unenforcable patent. Blockbuster decided to add Internet/Mail DVD rentals to thier business offerings. The law firm now must stand by the patent that they filed for NetFlix. Blockbuster will win the lawsuit and NetFlix will be told to pay for BlockBuster's court costs. The lawyers ALL get paid, the owners of NetFlix (share holders) lost a few cents on a dividend or share value, and NetFlix finds a better law firm.

    NetFlix is making the poor business descision to not get a second opinion. An unbiased second opinion, with no financial incentive (future billable hours for lawyers) would advise Netflix that they invented nothing. There is nothing to patent in the first place.
    They did not invent the Distribution model(Post office + Pre-paid return envelopes), the product (DVD's), the business type (service, rental), or the location (Internet capable computer).

    They were simply the first to:
    1. realize that renting DVD's using the Internet and delivered through the mail is a good idea.
    2. have enough $$ to hire enough people (software developers, advertising agencies, accountants, BAD LAWYERS)
    3. have enough $$ to launch a big enough ad campaign

    Could a pizza place patent the idea of ordering a pizza online? Would that preclude all other pizza places from using the Internet to get orders? What about delivering pizza's on mopeds? Would that prevent my pizza place from delivering pizza's on mopeds?

    It's just my opinion, but it sounds like things are working the way they should.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Scott, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 4:53am

    tough

    This is a tough one.

    It really sucks to take a risk and create a business and suddenly have other people do the exact same thing right away.

    Although the idea of renting movies through the mail seems simple. Netflix did it first (i think) and they did it well. and if the USPTO granted a patent, then I think they should enforce it.

    I would rather see a company enforce their patents early, rather than sit on a patent until someone else is successful and then sue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Scott, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 5:44am

    Re: NetFlix needs a second opinion

    Oh dear God, you did not just post that!

    Now Pizza Hut or some other wingnut company is going to try to sue and probably win, and I won't be able to order online anymore.

    Oh well, guess it is back to repeating my order twelve times and still getting the wrong order.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Dave, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 7:16am

    Re: Patent Law

    Jordan, I would question your reasoning. First you say:

    It is a given that after the product is invented, patent law restricts competition.

    Then you say:

    In order to actually form an argument against patent law in this case, you need to show two things:
    1. Inventor had sufficient incentive to invent the product/service without patent law.
    2. Competition is restricted after product/service is invented due to patent law.


    If that's true, then condition 2 is always met, making the premise absurd.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    giafly, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 7:50am

    Paging Blockbuster

    Don't have people rent a fixed *number* of DVDs. Let them rent a fixed *value* instead. Normally it would make any difference, but occasionally customers will return an expensive DVD and get two cheap ones. Or visa versa.

    Hopefully this would avoid Netflix' stupid patents.

    Also, allow Netflix customers to automatically transfer to Blockbuster by returning their Netflix DVDs to you. You handle the admin and pay each customer a "Welcome" bonus.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Wizard Prang, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 8:23am

    Can you patent a business model?

    I suspect that the problem here is that too many ideas that are not patentable are slipping through the USPTO.

    I also have a problem with companies that sit on patents and wait for someone to infringe them.

    Also... if Netflix has had this patent since 2003, why have they taken until now to enforce it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    wil, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 11:39am

    Re: Re:

    I know they do that, and you can read their customer agreement or search Netflix on CNN.com for the info as well. The technique is called "throttling" and Netflix has openly admitted this tactic.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Pin_Master, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 1:10pm

    Re: Why rent?

    The problem with downloading movies is the quality. I would much rather pay netflix 20$ a month to get a dvd quality copy than to see someone get up in the middle of the movie and walk across my t.v. I know you can ocasionally find dvd rips to download but there is hardly the collection that netflix has. Plus, who wants to tie up their internet for a whole day to download a movie either. - the 20$ is worth it!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Dino, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 1:16pm

    Re: Abuse of a bad patent system

    Shame on Netflix

    I totally agree. I think they not only don't need to do this, but are also proving to be a disappointment by being part of the problem. I wrote an email today to Netflix. I also posted it to my weblog:

    Unfortunate activity from Netflix

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Dave, Apr 5th, 2006 @ 2:24pm

    ah, the real reason!

    I see in the news right now... Netflix shares got a bump today.

    Netflix may actually accept that this is completely unworthy of being patented, but they simply made a calculated, cynical move to raise the stock price.

    More support for all that Techdirt has been saying about misuse of patents. I salute Techdirt for cutting through all the daily BS that's out there!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Thomason, Apr 6th, 2006 @ 6:37am

    Re: Can you patent a business model?

    They sued on that earlier patent, but perhaps more so on a patent that issued to them the same day as they filed suit. It's USP 7,024,381.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    anonymous coward, Apr 6th, 2006 @ 1:36pm

    www.greencine.com

    netflix et al are for sheep.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    rudy, Apr 11th, 2006 @ 1:27pm

    stupid lawsuit

    this is a stupid lawsuit, this gives way for the Post office to sue UPS for delivering packages or for Ford to sue Chevy for making cars................etc etc....Competition helps keep the prices down and Im sure Netflix wont keep the price down if they dont have anymore competition

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 28th, 2007 @ 4:16pm

    bb sucks

    blockbuster online service is crap my sister works there and i was told that if u watch ur movies to fast and send them in they will slow ur account down so u dont get that many movies so screw them netflix all the way

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This