The SG should stick to medicine. This is a social issue and way outside of his expretice. If there is a convincing social science consensus about the issue and proposing a likely solution, I have yet to see it.
I did an MS in Finance, rather than an MBA. The graduate degree transformed my life and earrings potential compared to my BBA. So ya, an MBA can make a huge difference particularly if you buckle down and get a GPA the recruiters will notice.
"Given the current political and cultural moment" is what cops often say to justify almost anything. We claim they should investigate in response and rightly hold them responsible to prove more than a vague notion to justify action. The same should hold for large corporations. Spend the resources to understand the situation rather than slam the ban hammer on innocent customers.
I fail to understand how owners of advertising based businesses think they can increase the value of the business by upsetting the turning away the people the advertisers want to reach. Reddit has a incredibly good user self-segregation that gives advertisers access to people with very special interests. Just what many other platforms are struggling to do today. Secondly, why would managers think they can engineer the people that use the site to conform to what the company wants them to be? I guess they have been sitting at that desk for too long and only soliciting the opinions they want to hear.
The most insidious censorship is to allow the government to select who it considers off limits. The problem with this whole story is that there is no possible comprehensive definition of who is a "journalist." Freedom of the press applies to all
No it is not. Marijuana is not impairing in a similar way to alcohol. It doesn't generally cause drivers to become reckless. It presence in the blood is not an indication of impairment. And as the article says, it is often just a police pretext for an extended stop and an easy arrest of people doing no harm.
The cop apparently used the extended arrest to badger the guy into admitting he was transporting. So the other part of this is never talk to the police. Ever person should learn how to politely say you won't answer questions. The cops are not looking out for your interests.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by YouMeandPooneil.
This is not a medical issue
The SG should stick to medicine. This is a social issue and way outside of his expretice. If there is a convincing social science consensus about the issue and proposing a likely solution, I have yet to see it.
What we've got here is... failure to handle the truth.
When you masters in the government tell you to lie to them and it will all be OK, you lie. Neither Congress or the FCC care about the truth.
MBA worthwhile
I did an MS in Finance, rather than an MBA. The graduate degree transformed my life and earrings potential compared to my BBA. So ya, an MBA can make a huge difference particularly if you buckle down and get a GPA the recruiters will notice.
"Given the current political and cultural moment?"
"Given the current political and cultural moment" is what cops often say to justify almost anything. We claim they should investigate in response and rightly hold them responsible to prove more than a vague notion to justify action. The same should hold for large corporations. Spend the resources to understand the situation rather than slam the ban hammer on innocent customers.
What we've got here is... failure to communicate.
I fail to understand how owners of advertising based businesses think they can increase the value of the business by upsetting the turning away the people the advertisers want to reach. Reddit has a incredibly good user self-segregation that gives advertisers access to people with very special interests. Just what many other platforms are struggling to do today. Secondly, why would managers think they can engineer the people that use the site to conform to what the company wants them to be? I guess they have been sitting at that desk for too long and only soliciting the opinions they want to hear.
The most insidious censorship is to allow the government to select who it considers off limits. The problem with this whole story is that there is no possible comprehensive definition of who is a "journalist." Freedom of the press applies to all
Re: It might be reasonable for impairment behind the wheel.
No it is not. Marijuana is not impairing in a similar way to alcohol. It doesn't generally cause drivers to become reckless. It presence in the blood is not an indication of impairment. And as the article says, it is often just a police pretext for an extended stop and an easy arrest of people doing no harm. The cop apparently used the extended arrest to badger the guy into admitting he was transporting. So the other part of this is never talk to the police. Ever person should learn how to politely say you won't answer questions. The cops are not looking out for your interests.