"if someone goes to prison for setting a corporate policy that violates the law, the CEO is at the head of the line."
I can think of exactly one time this happened, and it was because the CEO himself had created the policy (Enron).
Otherwise, the idea criminal accountability is part of the CEO's job is ridiculous. Clearly the world doesn't work the way you think it does.
lol! Which dictator did you overthrow today, internet activist Killercool?
I remember when I got a computer in the early '80s and read all the stories about how kids who spent all their time at the computer would miss out on their childhood.
30+ years later I'm making 6-figures and have a great life thanks mainly to that computer and all the time I "wasted" in front of it.
"Study: Megaupload closure boosted Hollywood sales 10%"
Actually the "study" claims 6.5% - 8.5%.
And it's based on the industry's own numbers, which is something of a joke.
Theaters need Netflix more than Netflix needs theaters. Why should Netflix change their business model just to cater to an ancient, lesser model?
Netflix is doing just fine without them.
The people of the United States, as represented by the Senate of the 115th Congress.
And no doubt you were whining like a child about how Dems in Congress were demanding hearings rather than rubber-stamping Trump's nominees.
I belong to the party that puts America first.
Nice non-answer.
We had 2 ABNB houses in my neighborhood, which is a nice, quiet area near a very touristy area. Since the owners were out-of-state investors who live hours away, they rented to anyone willing to pay.
Not surprisingly, both places became huge party houses. After the 20th or so time the cops were called within 2 months, the owners were shocked to find themselves being charged more in fines than they were making from renters.
Fuck ABNB. They made money while our neighborhood endured months of crime, violence, and disturbances.
Now requests for ABNBs are rejected in my neighborhood by the planning commission, and those who run one anyway get what they deserve.
What appears to you to be a lack of concern almost certainly is a whoops-got-that-one-wrong-fix-it-now-move-on-to-the-other-458.People who say things like this must have lived a life totally free from responsibility. "Whoops" isn't an acceptable excuse for forgetting about things like free speech and prior restraint when people's lives, livelihoods, and Constitutional rights are at stake. Yes, I sometimes make minor mistakes in my job. No court ruling is a minor mistake. It's not like this clueless judge just misspelled something.
I disable autoplay on my Twitter app, but it always comes back eventually. It occasionally even overrides my autoplay-killing browser extension on desktop.
It's a shame Twitter itself wasn't a party to this lawsuit, since it insists on playing animations without permission.
To whom do I take those phones for repair?
Whomever you like; it's your phone.
But if you want your money back for a defective product, you'd be smart to return it to the manufacturer.
(But if you're trying to make an analogy, you're failing. We're not talking about defects and reimbursements; we're talking about getting a broken product -- that once worked properly -- fixed.)
> "the city paid no ransom and resolved the problem by taking the devices offline"
Why would any of this be online to begin with?
So you won't be doing business with Fox News? Because that's the only place that's going to hire her, and that's the whole point of her ridiculous Twitter feed and this lawsuit.
Apples to oranges. One is a consumer product, the other is knowledge itself.
Sad that Techdirt doesn't get the vast difference.
There is no irony here.
None of which has anything at all to do with this article.
This might be a bright side, if the cable companies didn't also have an ISP monopoly.
I can honestly say that I haven't seen a worthwhile comment to an article in 15 years.
Yes, some are funny. But outside of that, they are pointless. The "community" aspect that Techdirt seems to think they add is an illusion; it's really just a bunch of people talking into space. They add nothing.
(And yes, this comment is just as useless as any other.)
There was a time when you could go to a site devoted to article discussions and engage with like-minded, intelligent people (I'm thinking Slashdot, pre-2006), but the inmates have taken over all asylums.
"which is both difficult to believe and entirely besides the point"
It's "beside" the point. Think about it.
I can't believe I'm writing this to someone who's not a teenager on Facebook.
"Amazing how the US thinks that its sugar coated sporting "products" are somehow important."
It's possible that they've been led to believe this by the billions of dollars that those sports bring in.
And while I'm here: Twitter has streamed NFL Thursday night games this season, and it's pretty great. The only problem is that Twitter has no discovery mechanism, so it's un-scalable without an complete UI overhaul.
Re: Re: Dumping grounds
You get that these weren't actually weapons, right? Or is reading too hard?