The Supreme Court had time to weigh in, genius. This is a Constitutional crisis; it should go faster. Bush v Gore took significantly less time on a much more complex issue. But that's because everyone actually wanted a resolution.
I run (among other things) a large image database, and we've been absolutely hammered by bots, starting about 6 months ago. Finally we caved and are now paying Cloudflare to put a stop to it, which has worked pretty well. AI companies - including Google - should be paying this bill, given that they don't respect robots.txt.
That's not how anything works. Neither of your sentences make any sense from a legal standpoint.
I came to make roughly the same point. "Skepticism" implies that, given the proper evidence, the skeptical person could be won over. That's not at all the case here, obviously. What Geigner inexplicable calls "vaccine skepticism" should correctly be called "debunked antivax rhetoric." Why Techdirt is following the NYTimes example of soft-pedaling and sane-washing Bobby Jr.'s nuttiness is a mystery. Perhaps Mr. Giegner will weigh in here to enlighten us.
... just pirate it. It's already trivial to find a copy to download. No one who worked for FB as long as the author did is worth giving money to.
How exactly will anyone become "insolvent" by not buying Tesla stock? That's not how anything works.
Also, nothing says "free markets" like tariffs, right?
This line isn't as self-explanatory as the author seems to believe:
Nor was Enola Gay herself, by all accounts, given that she was the mother of the pilot who flew the plane.My mother is a lesbian who didn't come out until I was 19 (during her marriage to her second husband). When I was a child in the '70s/'80s, a majority of lesbians over 30 did, in fact, have children. That's how life worked when lying to yourself and others was better than being a blacklisted social outcast. Whether Enola Gay was a lesbian is irrelevant, but the evidence the author offers isn't evidence of anything, particularly given the period in which she lived.
The Dems have been gifted a set of talking points on a silver platter. The Dem wave in 2026 should be a tsunami. Let's see how horribly they can fuck this up in the next 18 months.
The Government ultimately decides all Education issues in AmericaWhat you mean to say is that "In sane administrations, EXPERTS working for the government make data-based decision on education issues." And that's true. It's also something conservatives historically believed (prior to Saint Reagan). The fact that you worded it as you did speaks volumes about your non-existent understanding of how good government works, and therefore your political leanings.
Christians hiding/throwing away books was common when I worked in a bookstore in the '90s. We also had a Muslim guy who would reshelve the Religion section so that Korans would be on the top shelf. Religion is never, ever a net positive.
Your comment would make sense if Trump's various EOs and calls for legislation didn't explicitly attempt to preempt state action. But since many do, you just look like an idiot. Republicans HATE States' Rights when states use those rights to do stuff they don't like. This has always been the case, all the way back to the Fugitive Slave Act (which Texas is desperate to resurrect with regards to abortion).
I don't think this is the right question either. The Court's ruling about presidential powers is more in line with what we're likely to see: a vaguely worded missive in which immunity is granted for "official acts," where it's up to SCOTUS to decide which acts are considered "official" enough. IOW, this'll be another power grab by SCOTUS, while also letting Trump/Musk get away with murder.
You're clearly either a high school senior or college freshman. Take a few econ classes and come back to talk with the grown-ups, sport.
Trump inherited an economy that was pretty great by any measure, so he needs to knock it down a bit in order to point a finger at Biden and claim it was bad. And republicans, being stupid, will eat that shit up. When his dumb tariffs cause massive issues (just like in his first term) he'll whine about Biden and Harris and Obama(!), and his followers will clap like wind-up monkeys as they pay more for everything while the wealthy pay less taxes and laugh at them. We've seen all this before. Every republican administration since Reagan has ended with an economic crisis.
Just a reminder: Trump was 100% against the Sprint/T-Mobile merger ... until Legere spent ~$200K renting out floors of the Trump hotel in DC. Then suddenly it was a great idea. The corruption was flagrant, and illustrated how cheaply one can buy the President.
I'm old enough to remember the Bush administration outing a covert CIA operative (Valerie Plame), costing tens of millions in blown covert businesses and contacts, and potentially putting American lives in danger. Republicans have always been traitors.
postal costs don’t seem to deter postal spammers; remember AOL?You definitely failed your 8th-grade logic class. By definition, anyone who's been "detered" by costs has never sent you junk mail. Is it your supposition that, if postal mail were free, we'd have the same amount of junk mail? Because that's a very stupid supposition. In fact, we'd have MOUNTAINS of junk mail. Infinitely more than we have today. Every day. Forever.
I do know that the truth about The Truth About Emanuel is that it wasn’t copied for Servant.There's no possible way for the author here to know this, despite any court ruling.
Additionally, the Trump administration hasn't been shy about naming and harassing private citizens - including professors and teachers, many of whom are public employees - who protest the Gaza nonsense. Once again, cops insist on a different standard of privacy than what the rest of the public (and the public workforce) receives.