The letter just ends with "We urge Ford to comply...". That'll scare 'em straight, I'm sure.
I’m pretty sure the SC & other courts would not allow that to happen.Probably. For now. Take a look at some of the recent rulings from the 5th Circuit of Appeals and imagine what will happen when judges like those are appointed to the Supreme Court.
"Or are Americans so saturated with propaganda, and U.S. journalism so profoundly broken, that the blame for the suffering to come is just endlessly shifted elsewhere." It's this one.
I can make up random nonsense and rule on disputes based on facts revealed to me in a dream. I won't care if the upper courts slap me down, as long I keep getting paid north of $180K/year. Seems like a much better post-retirement job than Walmart Greeter. Where do I apply?
“cracker” can technically be a slur against white peopleWe prefer the term "Saltine Americans".
The only way to prevent something from being abused is for it not to exist. People are people. If there's a button marked "End of the World Button. Do Not Push!" someone will push it.
Trust is easily lost. You have to be honest and reliable every time. Otherwise people will eventually stop believing anything you say and make you document everything. That's why the original expression is "one bad apple spoils the barrel" and not "one bad apple is fine".
When I heard "RFK Jr" and "the 5th Circuit" I immediately thought of the Three Stooges having an eye-poking, face-slapping, hair-pulling spasm. I'm sure this will end well.
All vaccines are for stupid, as a secondary effect. They're like chlorine for the gene pool.
The problem is that the DMCA doesn't provide any downside to filing bogus claims. If the party filing the takedown request had to pay some non-trivial amount per URL and/or could be charged heavily for "mistakes", much of the abuse would go away.
I've been voting as hard as I can. Doesn't seem to have helped.
That is exactly right. The correct response to a clearly stupid invention by the court is a new law stopping it. That's Congress' job, and they haven't been doing it.
now with "and the LAPDF, too"
Paraphrasing something I heard long long ago:
Well, I have a degree in Computer Science, which makes me an expert in that and related fields, such as those beginning with C, or S, or any other letter of the alphabet.
No, but if anyone, anywhere in the world is gaining any awareness, information, or enjoyment from or related to any Nintendo product in any form, no matter how slight or tangential, or for any purpose, without Nintendo's express permission, NINTENDO DEMANDS THAT IT STOP IMMEDIATELY.
Darn it, I meant to say "countries", not "companies". Stupid fingers.
The EU should charge those companies 6% of their annual turnover in penalties.
And this is why copyright should last for five or ten years and after that it's public domain. You had plenty of time to make money, it's over now. Do something new.
Hooray for malicious compliance! Just let me get my popcorn... Okay, go ahead, block the entire country.
Exactly. The DCMA should allow hosting companies to charge a fee for each takedown request. If it's taken down they refund 90%, if it's kept up the content poster gets the 90%. If the requester doesn't like that answer, they're free to file copyright suits against the content poster (and not the hosting company - section 230, remember).