The reason he wants to sue Apple (iPhone) is because Apple is using You Tube access as a selling point. Dell doesn't. That doesn't make it right, just explaining why.
This is ridiculous though. A site SHOULD be protected from the content that their users upload as long as the site does not push the copyrighted material as the "attractable content." You Tube does not push you to copyrighted material, and have made moves to remove it when found. The users should be held accountable, but what I don't understand is, what does the user have to gain from it? Why post copyrighted maetrial?
Stephen pulled the best reference which states it all. I read this article a while back, and it shows how WalMart directs how things will sell. They force a vendor to create a lower-end product that still resembles the original product, so it can be sold at a lower price. This puts the vendor's reputation at risk. It would take too much effort on WalMart's side to persuade me to purchase electronics there. Remember, the product you see at WalMart is not the same product you see at other stores.
I rarely get a deal from stores where people care about what they are selling (zaneZEROZERO), but you do get treated a lot better. Our mom and pop music store might not beat Musicians Friend, but they will sit down and talk to you about your needs, and will back the products they sell. Costs extra, but worth it.
×
Email This Story
This feature is only available to registered users. You can register here or sign in to use it.
What Does He Do on the Internet?
Is he basing this from personal experience?