But, as we know, it's not about Disney prevailing, and winning a cash judgment from a tiny company... it's about the threat, about bleeding them dry with legal fees. Which shouldn't take long.
The ISP's can prove there are tens of thousands more broadband-connected communities... they just have to wait for the results to trickle in via DSL and postcards.
I did some research last night with my associate General Tso, and I'm thinking that using four 256GB microSD cards per 1TB, the entire database could be smuggled out in a wonton.
What's clear is that by the time these lumbering behemoths decide to become a "playuh", they're so far down the trend slope that failure is all but assured. Verizon must have heard that Yahoo was the the bees' knees... "Our own search engine! Imagine that!" All they got instead was the ability to shut down their own mail servers in favor of a poisoned, spam-ridden domain. AT&T would have done better investing in fidget spinners... at least you can still find them at a convenience store.
GAO... wonderful! They'll find real, hard evidence of what actually took place.
Too bad we've abandoned that old-timey "evidence based" notion. We can still check Twitter, though, to find out what REALLY happened.
And so we find the true value of large journalism organizations... big enough pocketbooks to pay the lawyers when you're (inevitably) sued.
Saw a headline including the (non-)word "cyber", and I can't stop facepalming. I'll read the rest of the post soon.
Well, come on, now... we’re all adults here. I mean, there’s “encryption”, and then there’s encryption. (wink-wink)
"The USG’s enthusiasm for open source software is wholly inconsistent with..."
... Oracle's need to skim easy federal money from decades-old, proprietary installations.
When bogus software patents burst forth upon the scene, the trick was to take an obvious, garden-variety solution and tack the phrase "... with a computer" onto the end of it.
Now, we're inserting "... using an AI engine". In this case, those are totally empty words; there's no universally understood meaning for that language, and the description stands on its own with those words removed. (And is clearly not patentable.)
Who knows what may happen upon a peel?
"Anyone clinging to that belief is simply deluding themselves..."
But... but... the American President believes that, and is threatening the Chinese government with those allegations. Is it possible he's deluding himself?
Yay, competition! Also could lead to epic "churn"... add a boutique service for a month, binge the content of interest, and cancel. That actually would be far cheaper than one-off "renting" individual episodes. (Does anyone actually do that?)
I've watched favorite series vanish suddenly from Netflix or Amazon Prime (sometimes from both at once), usually in mid-binge. What will happen to the beleaguered hero in S3E7? To find out, I need a subscription to PBS Masterpiece, Britbox, or one of Amazon's $6.99/mo add-ons.
For me, this completely obliterates the freedom and promise of OTT/streaming. It's also promoted a kind of "streaming hedonism", a live-for-today mentality that requires immediate, continuous binging to hedge against the prospect of that content disappearing without warning... and that's not my favorite way to view. Next question: does anyone care?
Bundled cable pay services certainly didn't care what we thought about their policies and practices; it was a take-it-or-leave-it proposition. (Notice I keep saying "was" regarding cable.) OTT services, though, were born and flourished due in large part to their desire to track user sentiment... make people happy. Have they gone to the dark side?
And the complicating factor is the fact that the rise of the major streaming platforms empowered individual content creators with new and undreamed-of revenue streams; now, they're feelin' their oats, and are willing to withhold and re-deploy content to maximize return. My Brit-cop dramas are now sprinkled indiscriminately across services from Netflix, PBS, Amazon, Acorn and Britbox... do they realize they're becoming the new villains, keeping me from my content?
And, as Karl suggests, will that drive me to the nearest Tor node? Make it easy and reasonably-priced, and I'm first in line with my pocketbook open; start mucking around like this, and my capitalist loyalty starts to wither...
Predicting a big sales slump at "Judge Gilstrap's Courthouse Lemonade and Fireworks Stand"...
They'd have to use the pediatric sensors for his hands...
I got it once. The unicorn ride was definitely cool, but that rainbow-shooting thing isn't as amazing as it sounds... I was eating breakfast off the mantelpiece for a week.
I apologize for thinking there was nothing left to be said about the #%*& monkey selfie case... this is brilliant.
As the documentary notes, Warner was required to set aside a $14 million fund to compensate those who paid fees since 1949.
That's an un-American approach... it's neither divisive nor irrational. I like it.