I just don't get it. If I, a mere civilian, stood before a judge and repeatedly declined to answer, much less postured and tap-danced, I'd be admitted to the hoosegow in the twinkling of an eye. At what point does this cross over into contempt?
Facial recognition can probably do all the same things... and it's already deployed and fairly mature. Wear a Guy Fawkes mask all day? Cosmetic surgery?
If I wanted to get a hooker to relax, I'd play soft music on my holophonor for her.
"... evidence that he is, in fact, representing the actual individual he claims to represent, and not merely inserting himself into cases..."
Cue the Monty Python bit:
M: "If you're arguing, I must have paid."
A: "Not necessarily. I could be arguing in my spare time."
At big public functions... conventions and sales meetings... we've had someone ask honorees to stand and be recognized for their birthdays... and then we play a licensed recording of "Good Morning, Dear Teacher". And it's up to the audience which lyrics they choose to sing.
"...the BBC haven't got any choice but to deal with them - that's the scenario."
Gotta love those report authors; what would we do without consultants? And when you commission a report, aren't you generally looking for a balanced, objective overview, rather than a Snidely Whiplash-esque, winner-takes-all war plan? It's a zero-sum game, and the zeroes go to the composers and musicians.
I hear that the "I-Have-A-Problem-With-Authority Society" is chartering buses to bring random, non-ID-bearing passers-by into downtown Paragould for casual strolls... who wants to join them?
Facebook recommends...
www.smallanimaldecency.com/
"Just be happy someone doesn't try to copyright 'Photo containing picture of cat'..."
How about: "Method and apparatus for detecting contact between human skin and animals in a user-determined social media photographic archive"? Come on, Eastern District... let's get trollin'!
Looks like someone needs a very special spanking.
Hey! New plot line! Infringers receive punishment at the hands of oversexed rights holders.
And there's a cameo role for OOTB.
"... O'Dwyer has been invited to the States to sign an agreement..."
Kind of like that cartoon where the coyote is "invited" to stand under the falling 10-ton weight.
Good Lord! No on/off switch? No cops on patrol? Why, those rotten terrorists would have a field day... doing their terrorist-like things wherever and whenever they want, right out in public!
It's a good thing that those nice people at the ITU explained it for me -- how I'd have nothing to fear if they were in charge. What a load off my mind!
As long as it can't track what they're wearing...
Only dangerous if you're USING it... not if you're REPAIRING it.
Plus, there's a black-box warning on page 3 of the repair manual that warns about injuries and denies culpability. (At least I'm GUESSING there is.)
"... advertising... against a competitor's trademark is just good marketing."
Let's not forget the bricks-and-mortar version of that - Starbucks' official strategy of finding the best coffee shop in town, and opening up next door. Brutal, but efective.
Wow... possibly a new record for flagged/hidden comments. No amount of hiding prevents a rise in blood pressure, I'm afraid.
But agitation aside, there's a positive benefit, at least for me, of posts as seemingly fundamental as Leigh's. Not a bright lawyerly lad like so many of you, I need to be taught these fundamentals -- like what the US Constitution actually says -- repeatedly, so that when I passionately jump into IP conversations with others, I have some small amount of confidence that I can defend my position.
If the copyrighted performance angle isn't working for her, she should contact Cracked... they'll tell her how to get it trademarked. Or patented. Or something.
True! But you don't need no stinkin' badges.
Re: Re:
Summa cum Loud-ie