OR, we could do both nonvoiolent and violent protests. You know, like in the Revolution and Civil War.
And people think they aren't a cartel.
Well, to be fair, intellectual chaos tends to leave more marks than ordinary chaos. After all, it's intellectual, which automagically means it's smarter chaos than you (see also Chaos with Jason Statham, Wesley Snipes and Ryan Philippe)
No, when you make your own bread, you're stealing not only from yourself, but from starving artists, hedge-fund managers, your evil twin, GEMA, Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande, Barack Obama, and yourself four more times.
"It is said that every civilization contains the seeds of its own destruction."
16 jobs, a unicorn and bob's sanity.
And what about about those NOT in the US? WE want to watch it too. It's just that a good number of us would pay for a sub for just the shows we like, rather than paying a lot for the vast majority of the shite out there.
About ?14/mo. due to the TV Licence that pays for the BBC. It's basically a TV tax.
You do realise that ads probably only make maybe $100 for the site/month, right? Which would probably be just enough to cover hosting costs.
India is a much more service-intensive economy. A much more interesting and relevant comparison would be China, whose knockoffs of big names (such as Samsung and Apple) have actually caused innovation in places such as the smartphone sector.
a) IT depends on how many Significant Others you have.
b) IT depends on how much you like unskippable anti-piracy DVD warnings.
Isn't that what the entire 80's porn industry ran as a single serial?
To some extent. GOD, can't you read?
I was going to say "Wrath-beta-Unholy-DK-broken", but yours works too.
Re: Re: Profits in the millions, none to the artists
No, YOU are the moron for not getting with the times and actually listeneing to what your customers want.
They may have produced nothing but they had a decent value.