Glad to see someone got that reference. :)
Still, question asked and answered.
The ruling coalition in the UK is made up oif yes-men and cronies. They keep taxing the poor, when the lowliest of them is a millionaire.
If you gave, for example, David Cameron basic welfare to live on for a month, he'd ahve blown it on the shrimp.
"It is easier to thread a camel through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to obtain heavenliness."
And what if I buy the album after finding it on TPB? What if I buy it after finding it through Google?
The world is never as black-and-white as you claim it to be.
And as for exploitation without proper compensation, there are documented instances of the major labels deliberately trying to cripple artists; there are documented examples of actors being scammed out of their contracted residuals; there have been successful lawsuits over unpaid royalties; the collection societies have been proven to employ embezzlers, fraudsters and conmen.
So my argument is; who's exploiting who?
CISPA is legislation. Which should always be discussed fully, in my opinion.
This was a single case. I think they don't match up.
Because we aren't. Exploiters come in all shapes and sizes, such as indentured servitude to EMI, or Universal or Sony. A choice is taken away each time someone signs their rights away in order to "get a chance" at fame.
Before we can have a FAIR and ETHICAL INTERNET, perhaps we should ahve a FAIR and ETHICAL WORLD.
Lie for peace! Steal from pirates! SCAM THE SCAMMERS!
oh, wait, wrong group.
Big Brother is watching you.
Oh, and so are the Illuminati of the public.
But you can't rpvoe a double-negative, only a positive. So, if a positive is a negative-negative and a negative is a positive-positive, where does that leave genertics?
/quantum
I'd much rather play "mole" games such as Shadows over Camelot. Still, the point is that word-of-mouth can often get you as much as a good advertising campaign.
Which is amusing because, as infants, we're taught to share with others. Can't have it both ways. Either we watch each thing on its own merits (aka, NONE) or we share and generate a buzz, and possibly more money for you.
Enclose it with a message, syaing that if they assist with TPP, that's what they'll become: shitstains on the toilet roll of the public.
I would, but then they might F**K ON to something worse, like investment trading.
There's a reason I don't gop to Reddit - it's like Cracked on meth.
Or, as /b/ so eloquently puts it, "everything is a repost of a repost of a repost."
Re:
But...but...WHAT IF I LIKE THAT?
Hmm...decisions, decisions...