You know, being over looked in the suit is this: "Drive was a motion picture that substantially contained extreme gratuitous defamatory dehumanizing racism directed against members of the Jewish faith, and thereby promoted criminal violence against members of the Jewish faith."
So it was Anti-Semetic too? Of course it's a brilliant tactic, after all, if the lawsuit gets shot down, the courts are also Anti-Semetic!
Let's see..
"sit in your mom's basement..." check
"actually do SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE" check
"im sure the 50 to 100 of money you just MIGHT have in the bank..." check
I have to play devil's advocate here on a few things, and for the record I'm not taking sides i this, just some observations.
From the comments I've been reading it seems like the consensus is that the DDoS attacks were "ok" because it was against the RIAA and MPAA. My first question is, when does it stop being "OK", when it's against something that you support, or is it not what you do but who you do it to that matters?
Secondly, am I the only person that can see a day come when /b/ and 4chan are deemed to be "domestic cyber terrorists" due to their actions? Not that I would want this, far from it, but I can see something like it being done.
Personally, I think if given a message with the actions, it's a valid form of protest, but I always think of what the repercussions would be.
Re:
Let me let Penn Gillette say what you and your "Ilk" need to do:
http://youtu.be/5x_-IoeSB-A
AC, go fuck yourself
Signed,
People with common sense who understand what this bill is TRULY about: The slow silencing of opposition
Re: Re:
-.-- --- ..- - .- -.- . - .... .- - -... .- -.-. -.- .- -... --- ..- - - .-- .- .. -.
"Do they think people are that stupid"
Occupy Wall Street would be a good example. (Hey let's protest big business....while using products from big business!)
Damn you Congress
No....what's right for the greater good triumphs over one horrible "musician".
The bill is a mess and is well...par for the course for Congress. Follow. The. Money.
You know, being over looked in the suit is this: "Drive was a motion picture that substantially contained extreme gratuitous defamatory dehumanizing racism directed against members of the Jewish faith, and thereby promoted criminal violence against members of the Jewish faith."
So it was Anti-Semetic too? Of course it's a brilliant tactic, after all, if the lawsuit gets shot down, the courts are also Anti-Semetic!
Those poor fans on that site...I mean having to listen to her music and all
Re: Anyone in Maryland?
I'm in Maryland, and sadly enough, this doesn't surprise me.
Re: Re:
I'm awaiting the day 4chan gets taken down for whatever reason....THEN all hell would probably break loose
Anyone else find the idea of a porn lawyer named John Steele funny in a grade-school humor sort of way?
Re: Stupid.
Let's see..
"sit in your mom's basement..." check
"actually do SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE" check
"im sure the 50 to 100 of money you just MIGHT have in the bank..." check
Obvious troll is obvious
I'd prefer if someone would drive a stake through the heart of the Twilight franchise
Re: Moths
Can't pull the wool over his eyes, it'll be eaten away....
Just my $.02 worth
I have to play devil's advocate here on a few things, and for the record I'm not taking sides i this, just some observations.
From the comments I've been reading it seems like the consensus is that the DDoS attacks were "ok" because it was against the RIAA and MPAA. My first question is, when does it stop being "OK", when it's against something that you support, or is it not what you do but who you do it to that matters?
Secondly, am I the only person that can see a day come when /b/ and 4chan are deemed to be "domestic cyber terrorists" due to their actions? Not that I would want this, far from it, but I can see something like it being done.
Personally, I think if given a message with the actions, it's a valid form of protest, but I always think of what the repercussions would be.
Re: old Blumy...
Just a quick correction, he's running for the Senate seat left by Chris Dodd against former WWE CEO Linda McMahon.