I usually just check their headlines, but they have stories this week that were my favorites so far. I actually read an entire fake article yesterday.
Is there any standard or convention for comments criticizing what you see as a badly written blog post?
From what I've read on Techcrunch, MG Siegler has a hard-on for anything related to Apple, and doesn't think twice about hating everything else.
He's like the Ahab of buyer's remorse.
Afterdawn's title is "Microsoft fires back at Google over patent dispute."
What is worse: they're just using phrases from a press release, or the writers of these articles are just that unimaginative that they use the same hyperbolic cliche?
It sounds like a joke disprove by contradiction.
Genes are patentable -> Genes are separate from DNA
therefore,
Genes are NOT separate from DNA -> Genes are NOT patentable.
That's a sweet idea. You might be able to fun part of your wedding through adverts on the dress. That's prime real estate!
Get the stamp out!
No, you fail. All wedding dresses look the same.
What harm do their failing lawsuits do to us? It seems more like a boon, in that they're spending so much of their own time and (their?) money cementing good actions in court. Isn't it all at their expense now?
Could she just put some concrete down under all the garden boxes? I know it would be a waste of time and money to do so, but would that count as "paved?"
The copyright is actually mine. Let's just settle this before we waste any more of our time.
I let David Slater bring his camera there. I also knew that monkeys are capable of taking pictures. As you can clearly see, I set up the framing and circumstances for each one of the portraits. The copyright is mine and I'd appreciate it if you would all stop lying and saying otherwise.
I feel a new crunk song coming on...
No kidding about them only stopping the last threat.
Did they just now watch The Dark Knight? Will they try to protect us from exploding river ferrys next?
You usually own the letter, unless there is some strange existing contract on the ownership of the paper. You can own a medium of expression without owning the copyright of that expression. The copyright and the expression are different entities in this sense.
With the end of the Shuttle program, people are leaving. Many of those leaving are going to be stealing and looting the program for all it's worth. Someone decided to try to go after this old astronaut for that same reason. They just want the trophy camera for themselves.
I worked at Circuit City when it went out of business, and I remember the new guy who started two weeks earlier stealing my work uniform - literally my shirt - probably so he could sell it on Ebay or tack it to his wall for some imaginary geek cred.
"Pro-corporate speech" is NOT pro-free speech. Corporations are not people.
Bad news for anonymous idiots who don't understand electronics. "Freeloaders" like you taking advantage of these messages are wasting your time.
You don't think of lobbying law enforcement because there is no such thing. It's bribery, plain and simple.
Newegg has been the better business disrupting Best Buy for years now. Best Buy is getting more desperate. Now begins some of the final maneuvers of a dying company, like the Lakers fowling everyone in the last 2 minutes of a basketball game.
Re: Onion - carrot
Green onion stalk