Passing law based on evidence? Are you out of your mind? How is any law going to get passed if the politicians have to gather evidence first. Complete anarchy will result. 😉
A small piece of duct tape will solve the problem. 😉
Yes, but the lack of correlation means the lack of causation. That is why correlation is an important first step. Sadly, for many, it's the only step. ☹
Cocoa beans are loaded with things that are good for you included saturated and monounsaturated fats. What's bad for you is all the sugar (carbs) they add to cover its bitter taste. You should only eat chocolate that's 70% or higher cocoa.
One of my favourites:
It would appear that we have reached the limits of what it is possible to achieve with computer technology, although one should be careful with such statements, as they tend to sound pretty silly in 5 years.
John von Neumann, circa 1960
A perfectly fried egg is cooked in a small pool of bacon grease over medium-high heat. There is no evidence linking saturated fat with heart disease. So enjoy. :)
Yup, it's time to get rid of the patent system.
Patents are a privilege, not a Right. Patents exist to encourage innovation. Clearly, they are not. It's time to get rid of them.
Intellectual property is an oxymoron. Ideas belong to the commons. The law even says so. Patents are a violation of this. But they were suppose to make things better despite the violation of the peoples' Right to ideas. They do not. It's time to get rid of them.
Patents are a privilege, not a right. Since they are being grossly abused, they should be eliminated. No more patents.
The only one good question that can be asked is: How soon can we get rid of copyright completely?
In the military, the first lesson they teach young officers is to never give an order that won't be obey. Too bad they don't teach it to politicians.
Why do they need a poll? All patent laws should be nullified. No more patents; it's that simple.
Agreed. Patents are not needed in any industry.
Patents are not needed by pharmaceutical companies since the only research they fund is to modify their own drugs so they can get another patent on a variation when the current patent runs out. (And, of course, nobody else can get a patent on any variation because its too close to the original.) Funding new drug research comes from grants from the gov't or other outside organizations.
patents only matter for patent torlls. It's time to get rid of them.
All software patents are illegal. Where does the EFF get off on legitimizing them?
Selling music isn't about music; it's about selling a piece of glory. Until you figure that out, your sales are going to be dismal.
Anyone who thinks a paywall is necessary just haven't looked at PBS. A nation-wide TV system that survives only on donations. If you have a high-quality product, you don't need to force people to pay you; you can thrive on donations alone.
Lock students up in an institute for 11 months per year for 10 to 12 years and then expect them to perform well in "regular" society?
A business is its customers. Anything else is not important.
Microsoft wants Bing to be the number one search engine so it got its lobbyists to petition the government into harassing Google. What's so difficult to understand about that?
US Patent Boss Completely Clueless
Of course. How do you think the patent trolls will be able to get legislation favouring them passed? Don't you know how politics work? ;)