The people consuming the news can't break that cycle. They have to go get the news where it is. The only people who can do so are the ones putting it there. If it's somewhere else the users can't go to twitter to get it.
If you don't think the problem can be fixed by reporting on it, then there's no reason to keep using the platform. Report about it, but stop using it to distribute your news.
You can't break a cycle by repeating it. Twitter is where the news is because the people making the news keep putting it there. Only they can make that change.
What would it take for Techdirt to stop using Twitter? What's the argument for continuing to give it content when clearly Elon Musk is not going to change? You can't fix him, or it, with any journalism. Just abandon it. The entire media has to let it die and move on.
At some point the people reporting about how horrible Twitter is (and rightly so) have to be brave enough to stop giving Twitter more content and post that news everywhere else but there. It won't die until there's nothing there that people want to read.
What has to break in someone's brain to just buy someone else's creativity and then sue people about it? You can't produce anything of value so you just scam everyone else? And you just know that asshole probably has the nerve to feel smug about all his money too.
It's also worth noting that the gray Oatly one is their barista coffee creamer, the most direct competitor to PureOaty's product which also advertises as being best used for barista coffee. Oatly uses their blue-grey (which is very different from the blue used by PureOaty as you said) on their regular milk substitute.
What if that "Backup" service allows others to access you files? At what point did it becoming infringing?
At the point that you uploaded it to a system others can access, obviously. You're intentionally making it sound more complicated to confuse people. But its really very simple. It's legal to make copies for your own use, illegal to share those with other people. That's not difficult for you, me, or any court in the world to interpret, and you know it.
What happens if your "non-infringing" backup gets put on your network share drive, and your roommates or family members take a copy and share it with their friends. At what point was it for a non-infringing purpose?
Again you're just adding more arbitrary layers to make it seem more complicated than it really is. The only part of that I'm not clear on is whether or not sharing it on an internal network with your roommate is legal. But honestly that part doesn't even really matter, since the only part that'll get noticed and draw any action is the later, and completely obvious, part where it gets shared outside the friggin house.
Further, it would be clear that this change would make "ripper" tools entirely legal (ie, they would not be against 1201 because there would be "non-infringing uses"). Yet clearly, people would use these tools to rip stuff and put it on torrents or otherwise "infringe". What a change to 1201 would do would be to tip the balance that currently exists.
So? By that logic anything that could be used to commit a crime would be illegal. Like cars and guns and knives and rope and masks and gloves.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Raugturi.
The people consuming the news can't break that cycle. They have to go get the news where it is. The only people who can do so are the ones putting it there. If it's somewhere else the users can't go to twitter to get it.
If you don't think the problem can be fixed by reporting on it, then there's no reason to keep using the platform. Report about it, but stop using it to distribute your news.
I didn't say not to report about it. I said stop using it as a service.
Yes, obviously. It needs to be reported on and called out.
You can't break a cycle by repeating it. Twitter is where the news is because the people making the news keep putting it there. Only they can make that change.
What would it take for Techdirt to stop using Twitter? What's the argument for continuing to give it content when clearly Elon Musk is not going to change? You can't fix him, or it, with any journalism. Just abandon it. The entire media has to let it die and move on.
At some point the people reporting about how horrible Twitter is (and rightly so) have to be brave enough to stop giving Twitter more content and post that news everywhere else but there. It won't die until there's nothing there that people want to read.
What has to break in someone's brain to just buy someone else's creativity and then sue people about it? You can't produce anything of value so you just scam everyone else? And you just know that asshole probably has the nerve to feel smug about all his money too.
Good news
I'm actually moving to a much colder climate and this just made my coat shopping simpler as I can now remove any North Face options from the list.
Re: Re: Trade dress?
It's also worth noting that the gray Oatly one is their barista coffee creamer, the most direct competitor to PureOaty's product which also advertises as being best used for barista coffee. Oatly uses their blue-grey (which is very different from the blue used by PureOaty as you said) on their regular milk substitute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e5td7-Bpvc
Re: 1201 time?