Elon Musk Blocks Likes And Replies To Tweets That Link To Substack In A Pique Of Pettiness

from the free-speech,-but-not-that-speech dept

Poor Matt Taibbi. He destroyed his credibility to take on the Twitter Files, and did so in part to raise the profile of his Substack site, Racket News. Indeed, Substack has become a home for nonsense peddlers of all kinds to create their own little bubbles of nonsense. In congressional testimony, Taibbi admitted that having Elon Musk hand pick him to deliver the “Twitter Files” has increased the number of paying subscribers to his Substack (though he defended it by claiming that the money has all gone towards journalism).

But… apparently Elon has decided that no one on Twitter is allowed to even like or reply to any tweet that links to a Substack site. Including to Taibbi’s. Oops.

Let’s back up, though. You may recall that back in December, as the number of people deserting Twitter became scary, Twitter instituted a new policy saying that you were not allowed to mention a somewhat arbitrary and random grab bag of other social media sites.

A day or so later, after many people yelled about it (and his Mom was the only one defending it), Elon rolled back that policy, admitting that it “was a mistake.”

Of course, since then, he’s systematically moved to make it more and more difficult to move to services like Mastodon, but at least people are still able to link to Mastodon and other social media.

But now, suddenly Substack is a problem? Twitter will still allow users to send a tweet with a link to a Substack page, but that tweet can no longer be liked, replied to, or retweeted. Basically, tweets with Substack links are dead in the water.

It seems that Substack’s “crime” is releasing a tool for more short form content that looks a bit like Twitter, called “Notes.”

And thus, the world’s pettiest man has decided to retaliate.

You could almost (but not really) understand banning links to Substack. But banning likes and replies? That’s just crazy. If you try to do any of those things with a tweet that links to Substack, you get an error message:

Some actions on this Tweet have been disabled by Twitter

Amusingly, this is acting as a bit of a Streisand Effect for Notes. I had seen a headline fly by about it, but hadn’t looked at the details until now.

This move by Twitter impacts many people, amusingly including many in the Substack crowd who have been falsely going on and on about how Musk was a savior to their free speech. And now he’s blocking basically anyone promoting or interacting with their content.

And, among those impacted… Matt Taibbi, who threw all of his credibility eggs into the Musk basket. Just yesterday Taibbi literally refused to criticize Musk for anything during the Mehdi Hasan interview, saying he thought Musk was clearly good for free speech on Twitter. And today he’s saying that Twitter is now unusable:

Also, yesterday in the interview, I noted that it was funny that Taibbi claimed that the Biden campaign got special treatment from Twitter in that they could reach out to people there, but he couldn’t. So when someone asked him if he had reached out to Musk about the Substack blocks, Taibbi admitted that of course he had, though he hadn’t heard back yet:

Of course, maybe that explains why Taibbi refused to criticize Musk yesterday. Didn’t want to cut off that sweet, sweet, access.

Either way, considering just how frequently these capricious moves are being made by the “new” Twitter, it again raises questions why people are still relying on it as a key source of information and as a way to distribute their own content.

Update: This legitimately made me laugh outloud:

Of all things: I learned earlier today that Substack links were being blocked on this platform. 

When I asked why, I was told it’s a dispute over the new Substack Notes platform…

Since sharing links to my articles is a primary reason I come to this platform, I was alarmed and asked what was going on. I was given the option of posting articles on Twitter instead. 

I’m obviously staying at Substack, and will be moving to Substack Notes next week.

Update 2: So did this:

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: substack, twitter

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Elon Musk Blocks Likes And Replies To Tweets That Link To Substack In A Pique Of Pettiness”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
44 Comments
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Update:

In leopards eating Taibbi’s face department…

https://twitter.com/edzitron/status/1644792394590851072

I never thought I’d see the day Elon would throw one of his pet propagandists under several Cybertrucks and at least 3 fleets of Tesla Roadsters!

Popcorn futures be damnded, I’m investing in lemonade AND potato chip futures as well!

Anonymous Coward says:

I am an artist and was thinking about utilizing Twitter to do some commissions so I could pay for a new drawing tablet.

Not at all sure what to think now. No other social media platform lets you have the ease of access and reach that Twitter does, but it’s increasingly looking like I’m going to log in one morning and the site will be gone or my password will be dumped in a CSV or something.

Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I can’t speak for the instances for conventional artists, but I know furry Mastodon users like to help artists out and spread the word across their instances. Unfortunately, the reach is smaller at this point even with community help, but at least you’re not likely to wake up one day to find all your links placed on the no-no list by Captain Free Speech.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re:

There was a time when his knee-jerk contrarianism looked like principle. He was on the right side of a number of issues, like the Iraq war and government surveillance.

He and Glenn Greenwald have followed a very similar arc. There was a time I admired both of them. I think they were probably always awful, and all they ever really cared about was getting attention. But 10-20 years ago, the statements they made to get attention tended to be ones I agreed with, and at the time I thought that meant they shared my values.

jarocats (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: You took the thought...

…right out of my head. I was just about to make the comparison to Greenwald — and how I too was bamboozled for years. Either they’re opportunistic hucksters whose “values” sway with the wind, or each went through something (traumatic?) to turn him into the, uh… let’s just say the man he is today.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

While this is probably just a continuation of the ‘you’re not allowed to link to better platforms’ temper tantrum Elon threw given the timing and the radio silence when Taibbi tried to reach out to get it ‘fixed’ I have to wonder if this was at least in part a bit of revenge for ‘botching’ the interview, Elon deciding that Taibbi has served his purpose and tossing him aside.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Benjamin Jay Barber says:

Gee who could be behind this?

https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/antisemitism-false-information-and-hate-speech-find-home-substack-0

Substack, a subscription-based online newsletter platform for independent writers, continues to attract extremists and conspiracy theorists who routinely use the site to profit from spreading antisemitism, misinformation, disinformation and hate speech.

https://www.kpbs.org/news/local/2022/09/06/adl-pushes-for-social-media-platforms-to-be-held-accountable-for-online-hate-with-ab-587

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB587

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Benjamin Jay Barber says:

Re: Re:

I guess its antisemetic to notice that Twitter has to comply with laws, that were lobbied by the ADL in the state of Twitter’s incorporation, precisely to warn users about “hate speech”. Then subsequent to the ADL labeling the website substack as containing hate speech, twitter had to obey the laws, which Elon said that he will comply with publicly.

Who could have predicted this?

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I guess its antisemetic to notice that Twitter has to comply with laws, that were lobbied by the ADL in the state of Twitter’s incorporation, precisely to warn users about “hate speech”.

It is when you place the entire responsibility for those laws on the shoulders of the ADL⁠—and, by implication, the Jewish population as a whole.

Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Funny how he’s selective about which laws he adheres to and where, isn’t it? Taibbi was hired by Elon to spin Twitter’s previous management adhering to anti revenge porn laws as some political injustice, why are those laws bad and these laws good and essential to obey? Why does Elon think he has a choice with one, but not the other when it suits his political goals?

bhull242 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I guess its antisemetic [sic] to notice that Twitter has to comply with laws, that were lobbied by the ADL in the state of Twitter’s incorporation, precisely to warn users about “hate speech”.

What laws are you talking about? To my knowledge, there is no such law.

Also, if true, that wouldn’t necessarily be antisemitic, though it would be if you blamed this on some sort of Jewish conspiracy or on all Jews, and it might if you solely blamed the ADL for it.

Then subsequent to the ADL labeling the website substack as containing hate speech, twitter had to obey the laws, […]

I’m pretty sure that the ADL doesn’t have the legal authority to unilaterally decide what constitutes “hate speech” under any law. They can certainly state their opinion on the matter, but they aren’t a legally-binding authority on the matter.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...