Let us not forget the company begging for permission to talk to the public about a massive spying operation INTENTIONALLY kept its own security department in the blind when it had actually implemented one.
Where can I sign up for Unlimited Oreos?!
I'm confused. If this is a 'fairness in game reviews' kinda thing, does that make it "GG vs SJW"? If so, which is which?
Does Digital Tantrum ... er Digital Homicide need a 'safe space'?
I'm gonna keep saying this until TPTB listen:
SECURITY ! *whack!*
IS ! *whack!*
AN ! *whack!*
I.T. ! *whack!*
PROBLEM ! *whack!*
NOT ! *whack!*
A ! *whack!*
LEGAL ! *whack!*
ONE ! *whack!*
Someone needs to get a Clue-by-4 and beat the entire government!
SECURITY! *WHACK!*
IS! *WHACK!*
AN! *WHACK!*
I.T.! *WHACK!*
PROBLEM! *WHACK!*
NO! *WHACK!*
LAW! *WHACK!*
WILL! *WHACK!*
MAKE! *WHACK!*
US! *WHACK!*
SECURE!! *WHACK!*
Possibly, if they offer something the originator doesn't ... like TALL sizes. *hint* *hint* #TallPeopleProblems
"Challenge Accepted!"
-- Every Black-Hat in the World
I guess I'm a little confused if the Navy really has nearly a 2:1 computer-to-active-duty-servicemember ratio.
Whether or not CDC wrote the DMCA notice, he spent more time on his response that the person who did write it..... and it makes just about as much sense.
(PS - You'd think after all these years, the man would learn how to paragraph!)
"In a final indignity (at least according to Malibu Media), he withdrew from an ongoing case, forcing it to scramble to find replacement representation "within 21 days." Three weeks might seem like plenty of time, but Malibu's increasingly-poisonous reputation likely preceded it. It failed to obtain a new lawyer in time and the judge awarded a default judgment to the plaintiff -- including nearly $160,000 in legal fees."(emphasis mine)
Has TD ever thought of reaching out to the named 'inventors' of this patent for comment on the absurdity of it? Not GM, but Robert Clements, et al? I could think of a thousand questions beyond the rhetorical "Isn't this obvious?" This would be not to harass, but to really delve into the the 'creative' process that goes into such a 'unique' invention!
I'm going to add a fart sound at the beginning of every song I have!
.... if you could call it that.
This ruling should put an end to any/all 'Sampling' lawsuits.
I was born/raised in California, and I've seen a lot of stupid, knee-jerk reactionary laws passed. We have Proposition 65 warnings that must be posted if a building contains a business that uses chemicals that are known to cause cancer. Nobel enough, right? However, EVERY building uses cleaning agents that contain some chemical that fits the mandated warning. Therefore, EVERY building has the warning, making the warning USELESS.
People have been warning of 'creeps on the internet' for 20+ years, but people will still fall victim to predators. ANY social network that seeks to connect people, from Model Mayhem to LinkedIn, will have to have a warning to satisfy a ruling like this. Every. Single. Website. People will click past them faster than an EULA, rendering the warnings USELESS.
"Police officers face danger every day. They’re not perfect, but they lay their lives on the line every day so we can be safe."The original draft of the editorial had the following additional sentence:
"So the next time these brave police officers want to stick their finger up your ass, just submit and shut up."
Completely aside of the this article's intent to focus on the governments obfuscation of the method it used to track the defendants, I find it utterly abhorrent and reprehensible that the FBI ran a child porn website for *ANY* length of time! Everyone involved in this, from the decision makers to the techs, should be brought up on distributions charges. Disgusting!
...Cy Vance's "white paper" on encryption...For all his actual knowledge, it should be just that: a blank piece of white paper.
(open scene: board room with dozen people sitting around table)
CEO: "Alright. Someones written something on the internet we don't like. Have the Legal Department send them a threatening letter!"
SECRETARY: "Who's our Legal Department?"
(all voice but one) : "1-2-3-NOT IT!"
Eduardo Gomez de Diego: "Huh? .... DAMMIT!"
I'm hoping after 10 years of brute force attack they get an "Al Capone's Vault" of pizza delivery phone numbers and Tinder rejections.
CYA, but pass the blame
This looks like a simple (ha!) CYA by United.
How many times, in the past, has a SDCC traveler claimed that priceless comics were stolen from their checked luggage? I don't know, but I'm a cynic that believes the number is large enough, and the dollar amounts large enough, for United to BAN comics from checked luggage themselves. The added twist, is that United is blaming TSA for it instead of saying "we're tired of paying out for (likely) false loss claims."