My personal suspicion is that it has more to do with "we don't want the Dems to pass anything they can claim has bipartisan support in an election year" than anything to do with what the bill does or does not do.
Your mistake here is assuming that the IP lawyers trawling the intertubes for anyone they can threaten are willing to distinguish between "games where the music has a streaming license" and "games where the music doesn't". And that's before you consider stuff like ContentID which is even less likely to distinguish.
Honestly, given that we're increasingly in a world where queer people are the ones most in need of privacy protections, I assume stuff like partnering with Brave to be a sign that you're more interested in the privacy aesthetic than actual privacy.
"Committed tax fraud with his organized crime income" feels like the sort of thing that'd get Cardillo v. Doubleday thrown at you every time you tried to sue for libel.
Just putting that out there.
I've seen the same with KOSA. A parade of self-proclaimed "allies" who are perfectly happy to throw queer people under the bus if it means they can pretend to have done something to help children.
(And no, they don't see how the existence of queer kids is relevant.)
i don't know what worms are eating the OP's brain, but i'm pretty sure they aren't of the tankie variety
once again we pay the price for someone teaching centrists that word
We're already seeing it remove people from the process entirely, is the thing.
Is it doing a good job of replacing them? Not really. Do the people writing the checks care so long as they can take money that would have gone to wages and use it to buy their fifteenth yacht? Also not really.
I don't care how hard Ohio State sues, it won't stop the Buckeye Tears from flowing on November 29th.
As a general rule, anything John Carmack says can be disregarded. And when Tim Sweeney is backing him up it's even worse.
My personal suspicion is that it has more to do with "we don't want the Dems to pass anything they can claim has bipartisan support in an election year" than anything to do with what the bill does or does not do.
Too late.
Your mistake here is assuming that the IP lawyers trawling the intertubes for anyone they can threaten are willing to distinguish between "games where the music has a streaming license" and "games where the music doesn't". And that's before you consider stuff like ContentID which is even less likely to distinguish.
Honestly, given that we're increasingly in a world where queer people are the ones most in need of privacy protections, I assume stuff like partnering with Brave to be a sign that you're more interested in the privacy aesthetic than actual privacy.
I have a personal dislike of Elon Musk, but it's mostly because the dude thinks he's still in 1980s South Africa.
War Thunder taught me a lot of things about military hardware too, but it's all classified.
"Committed tax fraud with his organized crime income" feels like the sort of thing that'd get Cardillo v. Doubleday thrown at you every time you tried to sue for libel. Just putting that out there.
harlan crow ain't gonna fuck you for defending the honor of his favorite toy, pal
In the words of Abraham Simpson: "A little from column A, a little from column B."
I've seen the same with KOSA. A parade of self-proclaimed "allies" who are perfectly happy to throw queer people under the bus if it means they can pretend to have done something to help children. (And no, they don't see how the existence of queer kids is relevant.)
counterpoint: eat shit and stop crying like a whiny little bitch about adults using adult words, motherfucker
It's about American police. Godwin's Law was invoked before anyone even replied.
please stop being bigoted towards queers by implying that shitstain is among our ranks
i don't know what worms are eating the OP's brain, but i'm pretty sure they aren't of the tankie variety once again we pay the price for someone teaching centrists that word
I mean, I can think of worse remakes than The Cask of Elontillado.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/09/ai-took-my-job-literally-gizmodo-fires-spanish-staff-amid-switch-to-ai-translator/
We're already seeing it remove people from the process entirely, is the thing. Is it doing a good job of replacing them? Not really. Do the people writing the checks care so long as they can take money that would have gone to wages and use it to buy their fifteenth yacht? Also not really.
this is one of those "every accusation is a confession" moments, isn't it