Precisely this. Whatever you think about Juggalos, their rights are also your rights.
I get what you're saying, but here's the thing. A tiny minority of ICP fans formed a gang, using a name commonly used to refer to all ICP fans. Now all ICP fans are subject to intrusions into their lives because of a few.
Having said that, I think that ICP needs to take some responsibility in both directions. It's great that they're coming to the defence of the majority of their fans who are not involved in criminal gangs. They also need to make it clear to the tiny minority that this is not cool. Moreover, it wouldn't be nearly as expensive as a lawsuit; a statement or a song would be sufficient.
Indeed. They only broke the spirit of the law, so everything is fine.
Precisely.
The black death ended feudalism and paved the way for the Reformation and Enlighenment. But nobody would call 100 million deaths a "good result".
Yes, I just compared copyright maximalism to the black death. Deal with it.
So... a bunch of old BBC recordings and outtakes of songs we already know, and no sign of Carnival of Light. Figures.
Hang on, it's only 6,995 million potential terrorists. Plus 5 million potential whistleblowers.
Also my thoughts. It would be far cheaper to invest in community policing. You know, working with communities which have vulnerable young people and diverting them away from a life of crime instead of luring them towards it and destroying any hope of trust with the community as a process.
I was thinking that. All the trouble that Adi Shamir had, imagine what Taher Elgamal would have had to go through!
Doesn't it violate Article 5 of the Chicago Convention?
You can stop the music, Vic Wills can stop the music...
Given the penchant for the government punishing you for protesting in public, they might think that this is more likely to get results.
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
Not everything that the government does is evil, and not every money-making job constitutes "selling out".
I've worked for law enforcement. Not in the USA, mind you, but still. The work was worthwhile, even if the pay was crap and the environment was soul-sucking.
I didn't assist in putting surveillance on anyone without a warrant. I didn't assist in the prosecution of anyone we didn't think was guilty. Indeed, I helped put some very nasty characters behind bars. It's something I'd happily do again, if the work conditions were right.
The government is not a monolithic entity. The FBI generally doesn't kill people or destroy property (trying to persuade people to commit suicide in the past notwithstanding). If they're going to destroy an innocent person's life, they use old fashioned entrapment.
It's the military who kills people with armed flying robots.
Different parts of your government do different things. About the only thing they agree on is that you can't know about it, because terrorism.
The sad part is that the anti-GMO side of the debate seems to be concentrating on perceived safety issues. When can we talk about the economic and social justice issue of the world's food supply being patented?
I've got the hammer and the nails. Anyone know the way to Wittenburg?
Re: Re:
I know! I saw them out this week, protesting the construction of a parking lot.