Isn't it great when private equity buys up healthcare providers? Going through this now with US Anesthesia Partners, which bought up an anesthesia group in my city after my surgeries last year, AFTER I had already paid the bill that group's bill, trying to bill me again (at a higher rate as well, naturally).
I'd like to extend a special thanks to Stephen T. Stone for reminding me last week of the time Laura Loomer handcuffed herself to one door at Twitter's NY HQ. I'd forgotten about it, and got to cackle about it all over again like it was the first time.
Seems like a potential 3rd Amendment question, which has been construed by the courts much more broadly than the quartering of troops in private homes of the literal text.
See, for example, "When Cyberweapons End Up on Private Networks: Third Amendment Implications for Cybersecurity Policy," by an attorney at EPIC, at:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2257078
Anytime there's something nonsensical in the Senate, I can count on "my" esteemed Senator to be right up in there, a black hole of truth, intelligence, and good sense.
Note to Manning Peterson: get a lawyer, since you admitted accessing others' accounts. Also, get on TD and read up on the history of businesses and governments coming for those who demonstrate their security failures.
That should help with Twitter's advertiser woes. "Do what we want or we'll give your brand account to someone else" is just the thing companies like to see to build trust and inspire confidence.
I took the "neutral algorithm" talk to accord with Justice Thomas's opening line of questions, i.e. "neutrality" being whether Youtube's recommendation algorithm operates the same way (or does the same thing) for cat videos as it does for ISIS videos as it does for videos about cooking rice pilaf.
Why?how would his YoutubeTV account be shut off. Youtube TV is Google's streaming cable TV service -- all you can do with it is watch it. Jayzus, overreact much Google?
When you don't follow through with your huge announced plans (hello, Google Fiber) and axe a bunch of existing products seemingly at random, this is the kind of reluctance and "wait until it shows success" attitude people will have toward your hyped new products.
Regarding Renee DiResta, it should be noted that she is also the Director of Research of New Knowledge, a cybersecurity company that may not only have a financial interest in the question, but which also conducted an "experiment" in which they created fake Russian trollbots to follow a Republican senate candidate and then smeared him for those faked associations. Oddly, they declared that their "experiment" had no effect on the outcome of that race.
Some of its suggestions have potential! I feel like Karl could punch 'em up a bit more, but they're on track at least.
It'll never have Bode's flair for sublime new insulting names and adjectives for our modern villains.
Under the new administration this will die faster than a Cybertruck in a carwash.
Did they not see how hilariously poorly subscriptions for CNN+ went?
Makes me wonder if this might fall afoul some FTC regulation about endorsements, making it seem as if someone endorses a product when they do not.
Poor Linda, didn't read the fine print in the CEO offer.
Isn't it great when private equity buys up healthcare providers? Going through this now with US Anesthesia Partners, which bought up an anesthesia group in my city after my surgeries last year, AFTER I had already paid the bill that group's bill, trying to bill me again (at a higher rate as well, naturally).
I'd like to extend a special thanks to Stephen T. Stone for reminding me last week of the time Laura Loomer handcuffed herself to one door at Twitter's NY HQ. I'd forgotten about it, and got to cackle about it all over again like it was the first time.
3rd Amendment
Seems like a potential 3rd Amendment question, which has been construed by the courts much more broadly than the quartering of troops in private homes of the literal text. See, for example, "When Cyberweapons End Up on Private Networks: Third Amendment Implications for Cybersecurity Policy," by an attorney at EPIC, at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2257078
So, you have to “mitigate” the potential “emotional” harms. Cool, so when your ex posts pics with their new love, now you can have them taken down!
Marsha Marsha Marsha
Anytime there's something nonsensical in the Senate, I can count on "my" esteemed Senator to be right up in there, a black hole of truth, intelligence, and good sense.
Note to Manning Peterson: get a lawyer, since you admitted accessing others' accounts. Also, get on TD and read up on the history of businesses and governments coming for those who demonstrate their security failures.
That should help with Twitter's advertiser woes. "Do what we want or we'll give your brand account to someone else" is just the thing companies like to see to build trust and inspire confidence.
I took the "neutral algorithm" talk to accord with Justice Thomas's opening line of questions, i.e. "neutrality" being whether Youtube's recommendation algorithm operates the same way (or does the same thing) for cat videos as it does for ISIS videos as it does for videos about cooking rice pilaf.
hed
Just gotta say, I unreservedly love this headline.
Youtube TV?
Why?how would his YoutubeTV account be shut off. Youtube TV is Google's streaming cable TV service -- all you can do with it is watch it. Jayzus, overreact much Google?
Always bet on beagle.
Re:
RIP John, RIP Root.
Re:
When you don't follow through with your huge announced plans (hello, Google Fiber) and axe a bunch of existing products seemingly at random, this is the kind of reluctance and "wait until it shows success" attitude people will have toward your hyped new products.
Renee DiResta
Regarding Renee DiResta, it should be noted that she is also the Director of Research of New Knowledge, a cybersecurity company that may not only have a financial interest in the question, but which also conducted an "experiment" in which they created fake Russian trollbots to follow a Republican senate candidate and then smeared him for those faked associations. Oddly, they declared that their "experiment" had no effect on the outcome of that race.
Here's the story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html