Any company doing business with government in such a manner should expect it's relevant records to be public, as should we all. This is ridiculous.
_“one of only three states in the nation where it is not illegal to access a computer, so long as nothing is disrupted or stolen. This doesn’t make any sense. Unlawfully accessing any computer in Georgia should be a crime, and we must fix this loophole."_
That is circular as hell.
Then the authors should have that right, and it should be non-transferrable. And not forever. It should be reduced to the original term. And it should not be automatic, for people who don't want that.
Mike has no problem with copyright as far as i know, but he has some problems with the current implementations and gatekeeping organizations, as do many people. Including artists who never get their cut from collection societies.
Your bullshit claims are transparent.
Yeah, i'll take the ads.
these solutions "don't scale."
They should never scale.
Roadmap: Not dealing with decryption requests from LEOs. Done.
They would just want their phones with a special OS that has real encryption, while everyone else has to buy their phones with brokencryption.
But the stupid legislation inspired by such movies is no joke.
So expected that you mentioned it in the first paragraph?
Maybe it's just me, but i find a good way to describe another human being is by showing how they changed your life. Otherwise you get crappy second-grade history book-type litanies of facts or the stupid sort of eulogy where one arrogantly speaks for everyone else.
There's "fake news", and then there's the Weekly World News.
_a Mille Bornes "Out of Gas"_
Eventually crevé!, also.
Lol, cost of housing is not news for the Bay Area. Sucks when the previous gentry get out-gentrified, doesn't it? And i am sure the whole state will weep when that anti-"sanctuary" person up and leaves. Waa.
I know, right? He talked about other non-Barlow people too. What a jerk.
Nah. It was like a perfect gallery call after reading though everything else.
And this guy is a legislator...
Certainly. And as you note, fair use isn't a factor if obtaining content in an infringing manner,regardless of the protocol used in transferring packets.
The fact that Waititi thought it was illicit or infringing says something, though.
It was based on stories from Assistant Editors Month.
Re: Will it even stop theft?
Sure. No one will ever again take another person's phone. Because maaaaagic.