i am thinking that one of the characters is more memorable than the other, and this actor is simply trying to leech off the other's fame any way he can, whether it is 259 mil or somewhat newsworthy association.
Yes, that is the biggest backlog of DNA testing by several orders of magnitude.
They'll swab someone they know they have run in on BS charges that won't ever stick, and have that processed though. And totally keep that in the system forever. It's cool.
I realize this all happens in the arcane and twisted world of the legal professions, but really, it should be damn well obvious that Google isn't liable even if Section 230 never existed.
It's probably so damn obvious, that this is why 230 was included in Title V. Duh, is my phone company a publisher? Is a utility company or a city a publisher if i graffiti or post flyers? No? Well neither is a hosting service.
But then they just inverse-Steisanded the Dalai Lama. Smooth move.
Dear Autocorrect: Marsha
Yeah, AT&T always goes all out when they try to sell the bullshit. Remember the pro-merger spots with children and fireflies? That was cute too.
So the post is both erroneous and and an assault on China not because of what it says, but because of who may have said this in a quotable manner once.
China and Mercedes officially hate looking at anything from more than one angle. That's probably an obvious thing with most governments and corporations, but good to hear it openly admitted.
Other things scale pretty well, like DNA testing, but LEOs certainly have a massive backlog of stuff like that.
Priorities, priorities...
They aren't interested in solving crimes, justice, or even the all-holy conviction rate. Cops just wanna snoop.
Just wonder which end of this Hagbard Celine is playing, and why.
CPAC is not the head of the FCC.
You do realize that people can be very pro- second amendment, and absolutely loathe the NRA, right?
It has even happened in a big way before, when the NRA was effectively co-opted by turnover in management. Even though their rhetoric has the same flavor, they were a lot more responsible back in the day.
Also it clearly shows how wrongheaded the NRA is about NN, so you might question their other thinking and activities. Further, why did they even dip their toe into this? I find it just plain odd they are weighing in on NN.
I would guess that one thing they were thinking was that they might look good involving themselves in something not gun-related. By presenting a weapon that can't possibly be used in the manner in which maniacs in our culture like to do every month or so, i am sure they imagined no one would make any negative associations.
Why would anyone ever read the comments as well as an article? Incomprehensible! If they comment, they must comment on every article evar!
Or, you know, choose certain comment threads and spam the hell out of them. That counts too.
No, it isn't possible. The best one might do is vote someone else in. This almost totally comes with the same exact problems.
It doesn't make sense to you (evidence-based reviews for lawmakers), therefore you impute a proposed veto power into the suggestion.
I do believe i have just had a bit of an epiphany about the mode of thinking of a sizable chunk of humanity. Thanks.
Well if people who do actually innovate didn't sell out to the giants constantly, there would be a more diverse ecosystem, and more competition.
More like we got Microsoft ram a fake open standard down our throats.
People busy playing ancient games (or those from last release cycle) might be too busy to add to the numbers for newer releases, regardless as to how much money a company could make from continuing to host the older games. Besides, corporations don't want anyone to be thinking about how they can't seem to continue hosting games at maybe slightly lower total profit (even if the margin is still way high), while a museum or someone can manage to host a game at a cost.
Yeah, that's what Techdirt has always maintained, for sure.
Are you some kind of moron? And is it accidental or purposeful?
The CBP doesn't do it well on our side to begin with. Especially at the largest checkpoints, the commercial ones. They are more interested in killing the few that struggle through the wilderness.
Re:
All of it.