I pay for them to ensure I can transfer a quantity of liters of soup per unity of time using the SPOON* Fixed.
Technically the soup is produced by me and the server I'm using. Then I pay my ISP to provide and maintain the spoon which I will use to consume the soup or feed soup to the server. I pay for the size of the spoon. If I pay for a colossal spoon and I want to use the full capacity of the colossal spoon then I will use. What the ISPs are trying to do is to limit how much soup goes through the spoon but none of the soup is produced by the ISP. I pay for them to ensure I can transfer a quantity of liters of soup per unity of time using the soup. They want to control how much soup I can transfer through the spoon. They are fucking assholes.
Next they'll be killing what? Babies with flashbang grenades? Oh... ACAB.
The Onion summarized perfectly what happened to the US: "America defeats America."
I share my streaming stuff with my partner. Thing is, because of my stepdaughter education I live in 2 different addresses. Since I'd have to pay added fees for more than one service I decided a vpn was the least expensive way to deal with the issue for now. Customer service was utterly useless to deal with this on all of them. I already canceled Netflix because of the price hikes and because the content isn't worth it and from the looks of it more services are joining it soon. I'm already planning some Plex setup for the kid because we all know where this shit is going to.
Short term profits are the only focus of any company with stocks to be traded, long term sustainability of the business (or the environment/planet) be damned. There's no future in this economic system.
As the article itself points out, as good (and late) as these rules are, they have a high probability of being shot down by a GOP dominated (and thus corrupt) SCOTUS while the a Congress bribed and owned by corporations do nothing. The US has become a dysfunctional corporatocracy. Having a dysfunctional, two-party only electoral system had a quite pivotal role in getting the country into this state.
Even if he hadn't changed the password, can he be compelled to reveal it to law enforcement?
Cloudflare isn't satisfied with winning against these crooks, they humiliate. Publicly. Without mercy. I like it.
A lot of lip service, quite a few lies and very little action. These are basically the modus operandi of these people. When a far-right loon brags about whatever "good action" he/she did, just investigate further and you'll find an hypocrite.
Harry Potter books were an important part of my life when I developed depression. It took me 10 years to get it diagnosed but HP was there in part of the way giving me comfort. This kind of asshole behavior towards the fans and the overall shitty personality of the writer (the transphobia and all) turned me off from the whole HP world. Sadly.
It's cheaper to ignore the FCC and keep doing business as usual than it is to actually secure their systems. Sure, they are certainly going to straight up after this. /s
People often confuse antisemitism with antizionism. The left (what is there of it in the US) is largely antizionist because of what they are doing in Gaza and in the Middle East. While some of the left veer into antisemitism because of it, most are capable of understanding that Jewish people are not necessarily Zionists, even those living in Israel despite the widespread Arab bigotry in the country.
Soros is a very common bogeyman used by bigoted morons to express their antisemitism freely.
I hope people call this idiot Magneto for the rest of his days.An acquaintance of mine is known by the nickname Simba. Because his uncle killed his father. You can't beat this. I'll be taking the line to the Hell Express with no stops. Y'all who laughed come with me xD
Let’s say your outcome happens and extremist content on interactive web services is still a problem.It seems from personal experiences within Bluesky and following/reading articles people studying the far-right that once they lose their amplification from either the algorithms and/or promoting with money they tend to remain within their own bubble. But considering it doesn't work then it goes beyond my capability to think of some possibility without studying more about the fascist movement in the US. I do believe that the 1st enables consequences for harmful speech. You can debate who says what harmful speech is considering past racist laws and the likes but it's still an option. I believe it's quite consolidated that some speech is harmful because we have already been there. Eugenics for example. Nazism. They are not ideas that have any good in them that were distorted by authoritarian regimes (ie: Communism). They are inherently bad, their core revolve around some humans being worse than others and deserving to be enslaved/killed. There are consequences when you let such speech run free so focus on said consequences.
Also: Feel free to stop with the First Amendment doomerism any time now. It’s not making your argument any better.Afghanistan was a very progressive, free country like 60, 80 years ago. Now it's a repressive theocracy. You are steadily losing rights taken for granted for many decades, sometimes more than a century in the hands of the current SCOTUS. So, yeah. I'll ask you: what can be done to stop a disinformation machine that has the money and power if Trump enters? The projections are a legislative with a majority of Rs, a SCOTUS with a majority of Rs and the executive with a majority of Rs. What do you honestly think is going to survive this scenario? I'm honestly terrified with this because the US still has a ton of world projection and a ton of military power. And Russia is enough of a lunatic with tons of power and a repressive/conservative regime.
You can test the platforms for the presence of algorithmically suggested content (in case a ban and the 1st can coexist). If not I don't have an answer. But the end of the 1st is guaranteed if things keep going in the direction they are going. You just need an other Trump and a few more conservative/corrupt judges in the SCOTUS to uphold absurdities.
Well, the GOP seems willing to run afoul of the First Amendment in the name of "Free Speech". The question is "will you have a First Amendment to care about if action isn't taken?". As I said, an option would be to ban algorithmic suggestion of content. Not sure if it doesn't run afoul of any other legal framework but it keeps speech intact.
Hah, Koby finally managed to pull it! Jokes aside, I like how Cloudflare responded. This should be the standard procedure.