If a baby isn’t a baby until it’s born, what exactly are you aborting?A fetus.
Whatever I said, which I don't remember, wasn't trolling because I don't do that. Maybe I pointed out that the weight of electric passenger vehicles has no significant impact on road wear (which is true)?
I saw this on Gizmodo and it was satisfying to see it pretty roundly dunked on there.
the guy who tells his students that recommendations are so evil you should stop using apps.How DARE they show me something I will probably be interested in?!
Masnick has ties to lawyers who have represented or offered to represent what are now considered cyberterrorist websitesFor example?
Last week, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority announced it was launching a “Phase 2” investigation into the proposed mergerWhy does the UK have a say in the merger of two US companies?
aren’t you supposed to teach your kids not to take candy from strangers anyway?There's a whole song about it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-4rhjO6xYg
Also, it’s slightly weird to limit targeted advertising.I think the idea is that without targeted advertising, there would be no incentive to collect all this personal information. I'm not sure it's the right approach, but it does make sense.
You're saying security procedures should be bypassed for someone bringing a dead body through? Wouldn't that make the security even more theatrical than it already is?
For a legal standpoint, they loose the “don’t censor” defence. They open themselves up to civil-level liability.Liability for what? I mean, I know you've heard of Section 230...
I apologize for my lack of knowledge and not being American.Nobody objects to either of those things, it was the confident incorrectness you were getting some flak for.
I’m aware that laws regarding physical harassment exists, but they would be hard to apply to the sort of cyber harassment that KF et al does.So you didn't read the article. "S 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree. A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she: Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;" Nor do any research whatsoever into your claim. "Many states don’t have specific criminal laws that differentiate online and offline conduct. Your state may have harassment and stalking laws, but not cyberharassment or cyberstalking laws. Fortunately, standard harassment and stalking laws typically apply broadly to communications—including online communications." https://onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org/state-laws-online-harassment/
As part of a tantrum, which is a very different thing.It's crying. The rule "making a child cry means you're the bad guy" is just wrong.
if you’re making a child cry, you’re probably wrong.Far too broad. Imposing discipline on a child, or just informing them it's time to leave an activity they're enjoying, can provoke crying.
Unless Mike wants the Senate to pass anti-harassment laws, like in South Korea and Singapore…There are already state harassment laws in the US. https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment/
it’s not hard to see how tossing KF off the internet might make harassment investigations more difficult.That might be a good tradeoff if it also makes harassment more difficult.
None of which should be necessary.
The ones in my rental building run for 60 minutesIf you put in a smaller load and they're dry in 40 minutes, then you can save some money by stopping it early. Regardless of any variance in the dryer, there can always be variance in the laundry.
If you buy a DeLorean or an Amiga PC and the company stops making it, or worse, goes under – you will eventually not be able to repair or find uses for that item.But the device doesn't immediately cease functioning when the company goes under, which is what happened here. And btw there are people still driving DeLoreans today. I imagine some hobbyists can still boot up and run their Amigas too. They're both obsolete, but can still be used.
If the resource cop assaulted my kid in front of me he wins a free trip to the ICU……Attempt that in the US, and you're very lucky if you end up in the hospital.
Relegated
Just because they’ve been
regulatedrelegated to the back half of court opinions