So they take down his stuff and as per their policy post the notice to CE.org. The guy gets all upset that his notice is on CE.org and raises a big stink about it. So to keep that from happening (and since it sounds like the guy doesn't want his notice on CE.org) they decided to hold off on processing the take down till he tells Google, "yes I understand that it will get posted to CE,org but take it down anyway" or "No, since I think it is more important that I not show up on CE.org do not process the take down."
Why does everyone blame the President when ultimately Congress holds the purse strings, which is the ultimate determiner if an plan or project is going to work?
I'ma stick a little closer to earth and say they need the exotic wood to fight Vampires..
Once the claimant has filed his notice and it has been processed all it is is information about what has been taken down.
Look at it this way. CE.org is providing a free archival service of what has changed. The Internet never forgets.
Google is required by law to accept and process the DMCA request. Once they have done so they can do anything they please with it, which in this case means publishing it to CE.org. Where do you see it specifically saying "We will not process your DMCA request (even though we are required by law) unless we can post it to CE.org."?
Um.. no. Its more like Google saying "If you send us a DMCA takedown we will process it as required by law and then file it with Chilling Effects." Their policy does not say "We will not process this DMCA unless we can post it to Chilling Effects."
As you should be. If your child is under 13 technically they shouldn't even be on Facebook to begin with.
Should you be concerned if an adult teacher wanted to be a Facebook friend with your children? I don't know, how about you get involved with your child's life and whats going on at school. Go meet his/her teacher at a PTA Meeting and get to know the teacher and decide if you think any communication needs closer monitoring. In short, take an active role in your kids upbringing and interactions with others.
That law is so broad that I would not have been able to interact with my own mother had she been a teacher at the school I attended when I was under the age of 18.
And you are correct. Skyrim is being developed and published by Bethesda. I think I linked Skyrim and ME3 together because of that mashup video someone did with the voice over from Skyrim with the video from ME3.
I wanted to play Battlefield 3, I really enjoyed Battlefield 2 and hoped to get back into FPS games with it. Then I saw it wasn't going to be on Steam and then was Origin only. Even before details about the EULA came out I wasn't all that keen on Origin so I finally decided to pass. I want to play Star Wars: The Old Republic, it will not be available on Steam and only on Origin. I really really would like to play it but I think I will have to pass. Most likely will have to pass on Mass Effect 3 and Skyrim if they are Origin only titles.
My main reason for avoiding the Origin store is that I really don't want to have to sign up at another site or remember another user name and password. The broad terms of the EULA really turns me off to this and many new EA offerings. I might buy ME 3 but not download it and simply find a pirate copy so I don't have to deal with this Origin's silliness.
It started out as a protest (the UK thing..) of family members and friends. Then the hooligans took it to the next level.
NO that is a comment by someone in an article run by a tv station.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2011/08/11/phil-matier-planned-protest-at-bart-station-fails-to-materialize/
5th one down or so.
It gets more fun.. were you getting married? Then you had to publicly post your Marriage Banns, guess who had to foot the bill for that?
I can only assume it is some kind of legalesse shorthand, but what is up with all the "Id"s in the quoted text?
My Lawyer to to the Judge: Sir, we would like to have a copy of CIVIX-DDI code and our code submitted to a third party for independent comparison . After all, you can patent the implementation of the idea, but not the idea itself. We think we have a case and can prove that our implementation of their idea is sufficiently different.
Also run into the problem of storage space. Tapes disks whatever all take up physical space that you have to keep secure and organized.
Woah!! Over NINE THOU... wait.. I see what you did there.
Interesting concept, much like the whole "who took the photo and gets the copyright for it" issue.
I can't remember, did that "works for hire" issue get resolved one way or another?
I'm not sure having a judgment that is being appealed to the next higher court should be published in this Register publication. If that appeal gets denied and the case dies then by all means, try and make that happen, but while action is still pending on it I believe it would be detrimental to the justice system to publish it in such a manner.