Considering that you've bragged about how much content you have on your drives,
So if this is true (I'll take you at your word) you think that that means it wasn't paid for? You don't think anyone would actually *gasp* spend money on content?
I have gigs and gigs of music on my computer and ipod as well (all paid for, or otherwise obtained legally).
You're saying that that means I support piracy?
You're saying that no-one in their right mind would actually buy loads of content, so if they have it, it must be pirated?
I'll take that as an admission that you realise that most of the shit you and your ilk sell simply isn't worth paying for.
..So I guess this will count as rape then?
>> that many fan pages may well be identical
Can't you just hear the lawsuits LOL :-)
Double spacing increases your intelligence.
You hit the nail on the head..
content on the website in question was found, in a court, to be infringing
it has to be found by a COURT to be infringing. So the linker is in no state to decide if what he is linking to is illegal (in the case of copyright material). If it was KP though then he would be expected to know. See the difference? IF not then you are deluding yourself.
there's no value to a work in the public domain..for the RIAA.
There, I think that's what she really meant..
We don't need innovation, we have already innovated everything
Sweet! No more patents!
Ill change my vote to The Interesting Man..
Whoops!
I totally fucked that up. I didn't realise Tim Cushing had written that and thought the reference to Tim above was to the first AC.
Sorry Tim, I thought the article was interesting :-) Forgive me!!
Tim = ?
The Interesting Mike?
Totally Into Mike?
Totally Idiotic Madman?
Temporarily Insane Man?
Tiresome Inane Mumbling?
Threestrikes Is Messiah?
Turd In Mouth?
Tries Informing Maladroitly?
I'll go with the second to last one.
Why don't you create an account then you muppet?
Since it is their fault
LOL :-)
No, I don't think so, I know a few Maori's and plenty of whiteys with Maori inspired tattoos. In fact in NZ I would hazard a guess that that sort of tattoo is the most common, I think in this case the professor is just stating that the artists claim is ridiculous and insulting, not that he wants to claim himself or on behalf of insulted Maoris, or is even insulted by Tysons tattoo.
That's the exact point. The big industries always spout of about 'loss' of potential income.
there could be no loss associated with something I chose to pass up in order to spend my money elsewhere.
Not according to the RIAA! According to them, when you *choose* not to buy music it costs jobs and ruins the economy!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
whoops - italics fixed to avoid confusion..
Considering that you've bragged about how much content you have on your drives,
So if this is true (I'll take you at your word) you think that that means it wasn't paid for? You don't think anyone would actually *gasp* spend money on content?
I have gigs and gigs of music on my computer and ipod as well (all paid for, or otherwise obtained legally).
You're saying that that means I support piracy?
You're saying that no-one in their right mind would actually buy loads of content, so if they have it, it must be pirated?
I'll take that as an admission that you realise that most of the shit you and your ilk sell simply isn't worth paying for