Service guarantees Citizenship! Have you done your part?
The fact that DIC is a company that imports and translates cartoons for children in Canada and the United States makes this comment all the more amusing.
And so the witch hunt begins. Will you protest your own execution when someone points the finger at you?
Your viewpoint bothers me because it goes against the U.S. Constitution when it comes to Due Process. It goes against the Geneva Conventions when it comes to processing POWs. It goes against the International Human Rights Campaign when it comes to treating suspects in criminal activities.
And more importantly, it goes against the basic, simple human morality of giving someone the benefit of the doubt before you decide to end their life.
Wait, the Washington Redskins are named after a slur for Native Americans? I thought they were named after a type of potato!
The sample size is too small for my tastes (90 subjects tested), but it correlates with an earlier study done in 2005 which shows similar results from a different test.
Logical Fallacy: False Equivalence
You've lost the argument with the first post.
Labeling things in this manner is deliberately reducing a complex issue that needs to be handled carefully to a rhetorical level. Worse, it does so in support of a power structure, which makes it very likely to be usurped and abused in furthering that power structure.
Counter-arguments to consider, with source citations:
Freedom of Speech does not mean Freedom from Consequence.
Life is full of bumps and bruises. Attempting to band-aid over them as opposed to focusing on root cause just doesn't work. Have you ever had to deal with someone who treated every little thing that didn't go they're way as a prejudice against them?
If someone claims offense even where most wouldn't, it is somehow the fault of the offender, despite them not intending any offense.
One of the examples I'm thinking of here was someone claiming that I was prejudiced against those of German descent. I find this interesting, given that the largest portion of my ancestry is German.
The other was a slacker who eventually violently assaulted someone else where we were working in a manner that could have been lethal. I'm not sure whether there was a legitimate case of racism or not (there probably was), but the guy was also legitimately a slacker with anger issues who evaded these issues by claiming racism against anyone who called him on it.
Microagressions?!!? Seriously? WTF?
I didn't know progressives had made up a new word to tar otherwise regular people as racist.
Apparently everyone who isn't racist is still guilty of racism because.. because.. Microagressions!!
I don't know how well that'd work when the President of the World is Nixon's head on a giant robot body.
1) Use tech companies to fight Government for privacy
2) Use Government to fight tech companies for privacy
3) ??? <= private
4) Profit!
I wonder what the penalty would be for teabagging your downed opponents.
I can tell that your Irony Meter is broken if you can't see the irony in Sen. Cruz using the story in an attempt to stall, block, and repeal ACA. That or you're one of those annoyingly stubborn and misinformed Dead Dog Republicans.
The programs that have been enacted so far have greatly benefitted me. For instance, insurance companies can no longer charge me a higher premium because I'm not a man. Also since I have the breast cancer gene (most women in my family do) I cannot be denied coverage due to a "Pre-existing condition." Even though I do not have breast cancer and may not get it until much later in life (if I even do). There's more that works in my favor so I don't really see any issues with ACA as it is now.
But then members and leadership of the Republican party have been attacking women's health for the better part of a decade now so I'm not surprised at this turn either.
I'm sure there's a "Yo Dawg" meme in here somewhere.
I'm wondering if Sen. Cruz realizes the irony of reading Green Eggs and Ham when grandstanding against the ACA.
The moral of Green Eggs is "Don't knock it until you try it." In the end, Sam I Am actually liked green eggs and ham!
This is the same reason most crime in mainland China is Chinese-on-Chinese crime.
Never mind the fact that the different regions of China are fairly homogeneous when compared to the "Melting Pot" that is the United States.
Re: Re: reply to Ninja
It doesn't have to be a valid DMCA notice to temporarily take down a video.
YouTube's process is pretty much automated and if a video receives a DMCA notice, the video is blocked until the uploader challenges the claim (up to three claims at a time). From there it would be up to Thomas to file a civil suit against Rojas.
Challenging a DMCA claim on YouTube can take a number of weeks to process. This leaves the video offline for a long period of time.