pffft, you call that advanced?
I use a tachyons modem. I get all my packages before I order them.
it has turned into regular mail for the younger generation.
I wonder if ICANN sue them?
wtf are talking about? Do you even have a brain in your head or is there a hamster in there running on a wheel?
He's an old school Christian. The real kind
So are you the Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh type of comedian?
"Nowadays, all a child has to do to access some muck is to log on to the family computer. Within seconds they can see videos of whips, goats, origami and tantric projection - the whole T&A."
Damn Mr.Stanley, you're into some kinky shit.
So is the right to bare arms. Your point?
"It is like innocent people found in a naight club or rave operating illegally or without a license."
what is this naight club, and why do insist it has a basis in non-Newtonian physics?
"The internet is fast, and the laws have to adjusted to address that speed, and to address the international nature of the net."
Are you serious? Then in that case, lets close all courts around the world, they way to slow for the modern fast past society that we live in. Why waste money on them right? From now on its guilty until proven innocent. No objections allowed!
"Then why does this blog keep saying that Rightshaven is making up laws?"
The court said that, this blog covered it before it did. I understand how you would get confused.
Your clearly unbiased view of Google aside 'Bob', please tell us how any of those crime cases make up for the fact of lack of due process in the proposed law for the issue at hand?
Did the mob boss and drug boss and whatever boss you keep mentioning get accused and sentenced from a private entity?
Face it 'bob', none of what you're writing has anything to do with how ProtectIP is made to work.
The ability to access content from the long term production, or is it short term access to profit for the few at the top?
But wasn't that always the case? Speaking of which, why don't we ever see news about how they arrested those abusing children in the first place?
I wonder if they do weddings and bar mitzvahs too?
Let me use a real world example. A guy on a street corner selling drugs, yelling "crack, crack, blow, weed" is in some ways using his first amendment rights to free speech. None of the words are in themselves illegal. He has every right to say whatever he wants on a street corner, if you look at the situation without context.
Actually in this case, they took down the corner to the "dealer" stopping many others who are also there from yelling or talking.
Regardless however, you can't apply a real world example.
So both my point and yours are null and void
"Stopping you from distributing someone else's work is not censorship."
umm, yes it is censorship. You're preventing communication, the communication is neutral to artificial factors. Hence, you are censoring it.
"This site can't make a distinction."
Finally you admit it. Yes, the site allowing communication can't make a distinction.
Since you failed to answer, I'll take that as a yes. Mr.Hansen, you may take him away now...
But Archive.org is clearly a rouge site. Can't you see its remotely usable to an artist. We can't have that!
"The USDA has a Fruits&Veggies contest looking for a 30-second video on how to add more plants to your diet."
I think they should use the one from the Onion. "Just Eat a Fucking Carrot"