The people are confused. Tech has advanced such that many people can now do things for themselves that previously they would have had to pay for.
People use libraries when it is too time consuming or inefficient to copy a book. Now its easily done. Publishers may whine about the loss of profits, but that's a pricing issue for their business model. The majority of textbooks are just facts. No one wants to hear about copyrights on facts.
What about all of the professional printers that lost business because people can print at home? What about the recording studios that are losing business because people can record at home? What about all the other businesses that have been impacted by home computing?
You adapt your business model or become the next Kodak or buggy whip manufacturer.
LOL
Someone got a common sense bomb dropped on them.
WTF????
Someone needs to drop a common sense bomb on all these "save the poor children online" types.
HELLO???? McFLY????
If these children are old enough to be unsupervised on the net, then why do they not know that murder is wrong, or beheading is wrong, or rape is wrong (oh wait... Steubenville).
Actually the response was so incredibly stupid that there was no need to correct the pronoun.
Using my or your mom in the example didn't add any logic to your argument.
Just for laughs I should add... Once you begin viewing content, it is not TOO LATE to decide if you like it or not.
My devices have off switches. If I don't like what I'm looking at or listening to, then I have the option to NOT consume.
I've seen exactly one beheading online. I watched it, found it distasteful and never looked for one again. I've never encountered one on Facebook, nor looked for one there. If I ever do get a beheading in my feed, I know how to delete it.
Limiting a person's options does not change the nature of a person. People who like to watch horrible things will still continue to do so.
Bribetards
It may be time to ease off the NSA and turn the camera lens elsewhere. Yes the NSA got caught.
Now the whole world is pointing at the US for spying on its citizens. The USA is not alone in that activity, it's just public information now.
You can be assured that most of the governments in the EU are snooping through their citizens' data as well.
Whenever there is an article about surveillance, the trolls usually say...
If you've done nothing wrong then you have nothing to hide.
No matter how much influence a company has and no matter how much an industry tries to fight, tech moves forward.
It does not care about protecting your business model. We moved to gasoline powered cars, we switched to email, we moved to mobile devices, we share content on the net, we will copy in 3D.
Adapt or die. Ask the good people at Kodak that thought film would never go away. Think TV won't move to a net based model???? Dream on.
IF Google changed the algo so that whenever ANY search for the pirate bay turned up ALL of the MPAA/RIAA sites first, here is what would happen.
The user would search through the results til they found the link for the pirate bay, then they would bookmark it or remember the page it showed up in the results.
Net effect on piracy? 0
Congress makes the laws, so they should leave the definitions to the people that make dictionaries.
journalist
1
a : a person engaged in journalism; especially : a writer or editor for a news medium
b : a writer who aims at a mass audience
2
: a person who keeps a journal
Seems easy enough. Those are the people that the shield law should protect.
If your Call of Duty CV can be taken as a threat, then we have a generation of Super Sniper Badass Seal Uber Agents out there ready to strike.
Online.
Stop complaining about pirates. Things will even out once we get rid of the leeches in the industry.
Pirates do not steal, they infringe. Leeches are directly taking real money they haven't earned.
TPP negotiation routes around transparency.
http://vimeo.com/53743428#at=0
"...there appeared to be little evidence that he was involved in terrorism."
I would just LOVE to see what the little evidence of terrorism is. Show us so we can finally see what it looks like.
This is a perfect example of why the government is in favor of supporting "professional" journalists and not lowly bloggers.
I love when people talk about all the freeloaders online.
It's as if online is some magical place where there is an entirely different population of humans.
"Even a behemoth like Facebook is unable to control every instance of offensive behavior that occurs under its purview".
So the NSA has a monitoring program to assist with that on a global scale.
Re: Re:Seriously???
You try to brush off the IRA analogy because the group wasn't large enough? Ok fair point, it's not a big enough chunk of Christianity.
Try to explain this one away. The KKK
Largest domestic terrorist group ever and in the name of Christ.