More like the National Center of Sexual Kink-shaming.
We also need to be wary of the Alt-Copyright, or the Copycenter, or the copymoderate, or the copmunist.
But has anyone feel that the quality of news has gotten worse for the past year? And no, not just with the right-wing media, that was always on the decline, but with left-leaning media sources as well. Washington Post and CNN are probably exemplar in the most frustrating decline, with the increasingly over reliance on sensationalism, pathos, fearmongering, and a tone deaf incorporation of a fairness doctrine that feels more like self-defeating bothsidesism. It feels like fact and truth are being taken out of the driver’s seat and in its place are anecdotal and emotional appeals.
Look, I’m not saying that either Washington Post or CNN are becoming as reliable as Fox News, but I feel that they are on that trajectory. Plus, Jeff Bezos owning the former of the examples doesn’t help.
Grass is green,
water is wet,
the sun is a deadly laser,
and Josh Hawley still is an irredeemable, pompous, and sanctimonious douchebag.
Of course, we know that these politicians won’t stop it.
We all know that these bots are from Mount Crumpit.
They don’t know, they don’t care,
whether the solution is over there.
Because their solution will always be murky:
just pinch your ears and blame section 230.
If anyone got this reference, Congrats, you’re winner!
"I hear its amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari Kiri Rock. I need scissors! 61!"
At least it doesn’t affect Section 230. And that’s about it.
Has anyone seen my Hoe?
Look I’m not saying that it’s not impossible. What I am saying is that this will take time. A response from Congress is inevitable, but that takes time.
Right now, the path forward when and how Congress will tackle section 230, Facebook, or both, is unclear. It could take weeks, months, or even next year until we can actually see any progress on anything regarding either subject. This could potentially supercharge any regulations for the internet, or maybe it couldn’t (after all congress is busy with everything else right now [though a piece of me do think that the former is more likely]). It’s not the first time that Section 230 is in danger of being changed, and (hopefully) it’s not the last.
Outside of committee, it’s too early to tell. The bill as far as I know doesn’t have a sponsor yet. But if I was a guessing man, I would say kinda unlikely. Congress is currently more focused on domestic issues and I don’t think that reform on section 230 isn’t the top of the list. There’s a possibility that SAFE could sneak into becoming a law by being attached to a year-end Omnibus Bill. Or it could gain momentum months later and go through the motions of the legislative process. Frankly all we can do right now is protest and/or speculate.
This bill is not only anti-consumer and anti-competitive, shop SAFE is anti-economic. Much like the other critics of Section 230, this bill reeks of an extremely naive, extremely misguided assumption that the only thing in the internet are the bigwigs and section 230. So, the thought always come down to control is the bigwigs online, fuck everything else. But what they don’t realize is that these solutions is like feeding Godzilla a nuclear bomb. And since we’re possibly heading into a recession during the pandemic (which makes offline shopping significantly difficult), the last thing we need right now is to make online third-party commerce impossible.
With this being said, outside of getting out of committee, I highly doubt that Shop SAFE would be able to sail through Congress. Especially right now, when even something as simple as suspending the debt ceiling is a Herculean effort.
PETA is to animals as Autism Speaks is to People on the spectrum. Born on “good intentions,” only to make a road out of that.
Isn’t it swell how one reactionary state can fuck over it’s own entire country by calling the shots and making rules and laws that override even the president all based on a nonsensical and insecure culture war that the nonsensical and insecure mob ruling the state desperately wants to win?
The Inmates are truly ruling the asylum right now.
The salt mines are full of salt.
The oceans are full of water.
The color black is very dark.
When you stand out in the rain, you get wet.
Thankfully that recall effort seems to be on the verge of mostly unlikely (emphasis on seems, after all complacency and apathy brought Trump). But it is a fine example of how batshit insane and petty the GOP has become. They’re recalling Newsom and spend hundreds of millions of campaign dollars—all because he had a really expensive dinner at a restaurant without a mask. That whole fiasco reminds me of this one episode of an animated show called Justice League, when Lex Luthor created a fake, million-dollar presidential campaign just to piss off Superman. That is comparable to the new low of the GOP.
If there’s one thing we can learn from the whole shitshow in Texas is this:
The GOP might be the most insecure party I’ve ever seen in a political system. They are absolutely driven by emotional response and nothing else. Say what you want about the Democrats, but at least most of us have a grasp of logic and actually try to preserve the constitution in the long term. But for the GOP, it’s always about winning for the sake of it. Even as minuscule as an argument with someone from the other side of the political spectrum. It doesn’t matter if the victory is logical or moral, it’s always for the brief, fleeting feeling of winning.
The GOP makes the Roman Republic Senate look rational in comparison, and few of those senators were actual gang leaders.
This doesn’t make sense politically
Question: Imagine a scenario where the House does manage to jam SHOP SAFE Act into the Innovative and Competitive Act, wouldn’t that mean that the Senate would have to vote for that version of the ICA? Wouldn’t that cause some Senators (like Ron Wyden) to turn on the ICA?
It is astonishing that certain House members are considering how incorporating SHOP SAFE into something so essential as the ICA. It’s not just Anti-Competive and Anti-Innovative, it’s also deeply Anti-Economic.