You clearly haven't been visiting long. It's DannyB. Of COURSE he's being sarcastic. :)
The people who use the phrase "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" who aren't being sarcastic usually turn out to have the most to hide, which is why the phrase they spout almost never applies to them, just the peons.
They should if it's a SLAPP suit. That's the point here - poor people don't launch frivolous lawsuits just to punish people for talking bad about them - they can't afford to. The rich do it all the time since they have plenty of money to waste on such cases. They'll even admit on camera that they knew they didn't have a chance of winning, but they went ahead anyway to force the defendant to spend the time and money fighting their frivolous case.
The problem there is that vanity plates make a ton of money for the state.
Their kindergarten teacher gave them a banana sticker and a sad pat on the head.
Given UNC is a state university, the state should have standing. So the state's Attorney General. I wonder if he's a member of the SCV...
No, settling is what draws the vultures. Now that UNC has shown they'll capitulate to baseless threats, every vulture in the state is going to jump on them.
There are a few articles here where Hotels/Convention Centers got in trouble over jamming wifi to force people to use their service. So it does happen, just not too often.
Yeah, clearly NOT DOCSIS 3.1. Ran the ping for a while again and eventually got a 31ms min latency! Wow! Doing really good this afternoon. :D
I think the opposite might be the case, that there's NO chance of any cohesion that would yield even one place to get all the videos. If anything there is too much competition not too little.I don't think you read it right. He's saying that we're increasing seeing movie studios setting up their own streaming service, and the only place to see that studio's movies is on their service. And that's increasingly true. Studios are pulling their movies from places like Hulu and Netflix and putting them on their own services. Old anti-trust violation: Paramount forcing people to watch Paramount movies in a Paramount theater.
Can someone please stick him in an old folks home where he can yell at clouds and watch Matlock?
Why would there be a market for reinsurance if that were true?Because the goal is to keep the actual profits as high as possible (drained off via exec salaries) by eliminating the people who actually use their insurance while simultaneously using them as an excuse to raise everyone else's premiums.
You know what else protects children from predators? Encryption. Without it, predators can hack the phones of intended victims to tell right where they are 24/7. To monitor their calls, to find their routines, to see if their parents care where their kids are, to read their private messages to family and friends. Hell, with the right skills or enough money to buy the right software, they could remotely activate microphones and cameras on the kid's phones.
Insurance companies are never out that money - they just pass it along to customers as higher premium rates for everyone. They're guaranteed by law to make a profit, so they usually spend all their time finding ways to show they're losing money to justify another rate increase.
Yeah, but it's pretty common for cable modem. I check it periodically, and it's never any different. Only +/- 5ms or so from what I posted above. Cable modem is fast, but has horrible latency. I got better latency on DSL, but the price/bps is horrible for DSL. Wish I could get fiber...
5 to 10 ms? Lemme check my Spectrum high-speed broadband... let's ping google.
--- www.google.com ping statistics ---Hmm, minimum latency of 44ms, average of 125ms... yeah, streamed games would be perfect over Spectrum broadband. ;)
51 packets transmitted, 50 received, 1% packet loss, time 50083ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.169/124.996/1216.346/161.458 ms, pipe 2
Yes, they have a long list of new flavors. Instead of just horse piss, we now can also get donkey piss, cow piss, goat piss, sheep piss, and hundreds of others! ;)
What makes him a troll is that he demands outrageous license terms, turning down offers of the going rate, or even just over the going rate. He doesn't want the going rate, he want 100X the going rate, and THAT makes him a troll.
The biggest issue I have with this is it's yet another way of showing we don't own what we buy. This is a blatant attempt at making damn sure that you don't own even the slightest bit of a game - you're renting not just the game, but the game machine the game runs on. You own the TV and the controller, and google owns the rest. Wanna mod the game? Sorry, it's not yours. Wanna keep playing after Google inevitably shuts it down. Sorry, all you ever got was a stream of video. Nothing to hack to make work later (even more of an issue than always connected games!).
Re: Re: Watermark removal
All the old editors had something akin to "show control codes". Whatever happened to that? In fact, more than half the editors out now simply refuse to open a plain text file if they detect unknown codes in it.