"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power is kind of neat." -John Lehman
I suppose I could find out by visiting links, but it would be nice not to have to. Is this:
Just to be clear, the mythical creature on the side of the Pixar vehicle is a Pegasus, not a unicorn.
It's a minor point, to be sure. But the Pixar van is not, in fact, a purple van with a unicorn.
Ah, but I win first place, too, because I claim copyright on his comment! BWAH HAH HAH HAH!
I hereby claim copyright on everything that has not yet been created.
You'll be hearing from my lawyer. All of you. Everyone.
Not just charges and conviction, but strict time limits, and rules prohibiting use of the property while in evidence. Severe penalties for violating either rule. Severe penalties for damaging or losing the property.
And zero tolerance for those penalties. Turnabout is fair play.
"Using the power of Congress to say that a private organization shouldn't talk about the law is..."
...the exact definition of censorship, and contrary to the first amendment that Congress is tasked with upholding.
News update: it is now legal to practice arithmetic in Oregon without first obtaining a Master's degree and licensing and certification.
They forgot to say "pretty please".
This piece seems hauntingly familiar. I swear I'd read it before, and recently. Like, less than a month ago.
Still suffering from self-inflicted wounds, Blizzard shoots itself to stop the bleeding.
I still think "The Four Mop-Tops From A Place That Shall Not Be Named In Order To Avoid Trademark Litigation" just rolls off the tongue, don't you?
When each of the services tries to pull in customers by locking down exclusive desirable content, it's not competition. It's just a different kind of monopoly.
Is atrial fibrillation an indicator of mass murder intentions? Asking for a friend.
And I'm in my 60s, which is old enough to remember the cartoon that played on Captain Kangaroo.
But I didn't know about Tom Seaver.
"...calling me all sorts of creative names..."
I haven't been following the comments, but I bet most of the names aren't all that creative.
"Maybe I'm getting old, but I recall it being 640K not 640Meg" The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
My new patent:
1) A thing
2) which does a thing.
Another one:
1) A thing
2) which does a thing
3) with a computer!
And finally:
1) A thing
2) which does a thing
3) IN SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!
See you in court. All of you. Everyone.