Like The Rest Of Its 5G Footprint, Verizon 5G Sports Venue Availability Is Being Overhyped

from the ill-communication dept

Have we mentioned lately that 5G is being over-hyped? While it’s an important evolutionary step in wireless connectivity, it’s far from the revolution hardware vendors and cellular carriers are promising. Verizon, for example, insists that 5G is the “fourth industrial revolution” that will almost miraculously spur the smart cities and smarter cars of tomorrow. While 5G is important (in that faster, more resilient networks are always important), the idea that 5G will fundamentally transform the world tends to overshoot the mark.

Carriers haven’t quite learned yet that over-hyping the standard (or flat out lying about it) only serves to associate it with disappointment in the minds of consumers. Verizon, for example, has crowed widely about the company’s early 5G launches, but when reporters and users actually try to use these networks, they routinely find they’re barely available.

To hype the standard further, Verizon has been deploying it to select parts of a handful of major sports venues, insisting in its press releases that these early deployments are “fundamentally changing the way we live, work and play.” But when reporters actually press the company on where it’s available, they quickly discover it’s, well, not. While Verizon has been hyping 5G availability in NFL stadiums, deeper inquiries have shown that the service is available in only a few areas because the millimeter wave spectrum Verizon is using for these early efforts has a hard time with range and penetrating walls.

The same thing is now playing out in other major sporting venues. While Verizon has claimed in press statements that it will soon be offering 5G in more than 10 major sports venues, Jon Brodkin at Ars Technica pressed them for additional detail and came away notably unimpressed:

“…When contacted by Ars, Verizon said the 5G network doesn’t cover the whole arena for any of these NBA facilities. “Just certain seating areas” in the NBA arenas have access to 5G, a Verizon spokesperson told us.

This isn’t surprising, given that Verizon’s early 5G rollout relies heavily on millimeter-wave signals that don’t travel far and are easily blocked by walls and other obstacles. But while NFL stadiums typically seat between 60,000 and 80,000 people, the seating capacity in NBA arenas is generally 17,000 to 21,000. Despite the big difference in size, Verizon’s 5G network isn’t yet capable of covering all the seating areas in any one of these facilities.

Yes, the transformative, revolutionary power of being able to get 1 Gbps connectivity you probably won’t use in “a few seating areas.”

Again, 5G will be a good thing, in that faster, lower latency, tougher networks are certainly good. But the empty hype carriers are using to promote what the standard can actually do (no it can’t cure cancer) and where it’s available (Cisco predicts 5G will still only account for around 10% of all mobile connections three years from now) is only sowing distrust among consumers.

There’s a reason AT&T and Verizon are trying to hide 5G mapping data, and it’s not because they’re excited about its revolutionary capacity for change. They’re using the modestly-important standard to not only justify charging consumers higher rates, but as a lynchpin to deregulate industry; as in: we don’t need any consumer protections because 5G will soon be available everywhere as a sort of a competitive panacea. You’re not supposed to know that claim isn’t actually true. Telecom remains a fundamentally broken sector, with regulatory capture and mindless merger mania the fashion of the age. 5G isn’t going to fix any of this.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Like The Rest Of Its 5G Footprint, Verizon 5G Sports Venue Availability Is Being Overhyped”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

It,s well known that 5g is very expensive to install, can be blocked by wall,s ,so it will be only viable to have it in urban area,s ,towns, city,s ,it makes no economic sense to have 5g in rural area,s .
Especially in america where theres, little competition among wireless providers ,
phones will just use 3g or 4g if theres no 5g signal avaidable .
5G is like streaming video on the internet,
It was years before services and apps were developed before we reached
the point where almost any tv program is avaidable to watch legally.
After the mp3 was invented it was years before apple provided the ipod
and itunes was online to buy music .
5g has great potential for providing high speed service,s
maybe in 3-5 years when the network is actually built.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

If 5G is 1G then it must be fed by fiber. If 5G transceivers have to be placed every few homes to get full coverage then it will already deliver fiber to the home everywhere 5G is available. Given that, there really is no reason to buy all new hardware. Just install existing gigabit tech in every home including gigabit wifi.

5G is a complete joke. Yeah, the cellular networks could be more stable and reliable but reducing their effective range and using a wavelength that can’t cut through a bedsheet cancels out most of the gains. Just beef up 4G (in terms of reliability and signal strength), back it up with greater bandwidth at existing towers (allowing the removal of any and all data caps) and we’re golden.

That One Guy (profile) says:

About that...

Again, 5G will be a good thing, in that faster, lower latency, tougher networks are certainly good.

The unfortunate thing is that for all the benefits 5G could have, the ISP’s have basically hamstrung them from the start with their greed.

Faster connections sound good… right until you hit your cap and are either throttled back down to dial-up speeds or start paying out the nose to actually use that connection.

Lower latency, and tougher networks likewise sound good… so long as they can be bothered to both roll them out enough to matter, and keep the equipment in good enough shape to actually be useful.

Given an extensive history of greed and incompetence/indifference with what they already offer I see no reason to assume they will treat 5G any different, and as such I expect any ‘gains’ to be well overshadowed by the hidden fees and various other ‘conditions’ that will be bundled with it.

YouPeopleShouldBeSHOT (profile) says:



Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...