Dick Cheney lies? Hasn't this already been established?
"Hollywood accounting has shown over the years that some of the most successful movies have yet to show a profit."
You would think a good lawyer would know this before making such demands.
"But he set aside his own decision, as he said 'likely to be overturned'"
I thought he said because it was likely to be stayed because of an appeal?
You'd like to read the book but won't pay the price. Doesn't that mean you don't value the book at the price they're selling it?
There are laws against that kind of operation so the gov't couldn't just "open-source the entire thing".
I have to provide ID and a boarding pass before I enter the security checkpoint. I then have to show the boarding pass as I walk through the metal detector and again when I go to board the plane itself.
How long has it been since you've flown AC?
Evidently you didn't read the article
Script-reading is a failure of the business operating the call center, not technology or call centers themselves. I started in Technical Support after I graduated college and we weren't given a script, we were given the tools and the authority to fix the customer's problems.
gov't employees have sovereign immunity. you'd have to eliminate that first, and that isn't going to happen
These companies employ lawyers with brains, do they not? What am I saying, of course they do... the lawyers know this won't fly, legally speaking, but they're still getting paid so what do they care?
Just wait... there'll be some congressman somewhere looking to make a name for him or herself that will introduce legislation to try to "fix" this.
How is it "technically" illegal for the gov't to have a list of gun owners? If the State requires gun purchasers to register their property, how is that illegal? How is registering your gun different from registering your car?
The problems I see with a dedicated security person at a school are
1. This security person couldn't cover every possible entry point
2. Waiting around for something to happen will inevitably lead to complacency
3. A dedicated security person could cost upwards of $100k (in total compensation) depending on what part of the country. With schools cutting after school programs and things of that nature, that's a tough pill to swallow.
Your idea of trained volunteers or even training certain school administrators would be better.
I have a feeling the anti-gun crowd wouldn't like the idea of removing the "gun free zone" signs, which is why I think more gun "control" is the more likely outcome.
"The state of the browser market was an example of Microsoft abusing it's monopoly."
MS wasn't preventing the user from installing a competing product. How could bundling 1 product with another be considered abuse?
In general, the class of companies that are "too big to fail" got there with government help. Those are businesses that would never have grown that large in the absence of gov't intervention. I'm talking about natural monopolies, companies that got they way they are because they were better than everyone else.
It is rare a monopoly exists for very long because the market is constantly changing. Just because a monopoly exists today does not mean it will exist tomorrow. That does not mean there are no alternatives.
AC -- during the IE5/6 days, IE had a market share north of 95%. That constituted a monopoly, or at least enough of a monopoly to get sued by the US gov't and the EU for Antitrust claims.
I think Microsoft got railroaded. Netscape claimed MS was abusing its monopoly power by giving away IE and/or bundling it with Win98 (or whatever version it was). I'm sorry, but it was MS's OS. If they want to bundle an internet browser with it, that's their choice to do so. MS was not preventing people from installing a competing product.
"I didn't say there is something inherently wrong with a monopoly,"
You're right. I have no idea where I got that from. My bad.
I still don't see understand why you feel competition is broken. What aspect of competition does a monopoly break?
Re: Re:
but classifying broadband to a public utility won't fix the underlying issue - regional monopolies which largely prevent competition.
If Comcast had a serious competitor or two in areas you'd see that if they started shaking down Netflix or throttling them, their competitor could use such actions in their own marketing to steal customers. There you go - problem solved without additional government