They say that fair use is the safety valve on copyright, but honestly I feel like piracy is more so.
Rich companies can lobby all they want, but at the end of the day they won't stamp out piracy. The more they push, the worse the piracy gets. When they actually innovate and give reasons to buy, piracy abates. That is the very definition of a safety valve.
Ask the wrong Americans more like.
I'd say fixing your earlier mistakes is a pretty big priority. The lesson is: get it right the first time then you won't have to revisit it.
Please try to refrain from using the name Nigel in TD comments.
:) Jk Nigel is a fun name.
Prouder than ever to live north of the 49th parallel.
I think we need to be nice to Buhl. IMO Bennett had it right when he described her "cray cray" and if she starts running around with a sawed off shotgun I don't want anyone here to be on the list.
Offer her a snickers or something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9-Oxkqbjpw
It's exciting to see it gain more traction.
Anyways, the beauty of it is that arguing against this idea is arguing in favour of obvious patents OR if the other side says that it's totally normal for companies to come up with the same idea but they shouldn't be punished for it then there you have an argument at least for an independent invention defense.
Of course lobbying trumps logic everyday, but it's nice to logic dream.
Can Canada not grant the patent but the have their "FDA" disallow the drug? There are lots of drugs available in the US that we disallow and vice versa.
It's surprisingly comfy all the way up here. We are apparently in very good company.
You have to really question any group that is fundamentally opposed to evidence.
Not to mention the lobbying to get IP law to the craziness it is today. That doesn't come cheap.
Unenforced laws should be repealed.
Of course my law requiring the retraction of unenforced laws would probably also be repealed. META!
I nominate "corruption laundering" as the best catchphrase of 2013.
It can be used in so many more situations beyond regulatory capture.
Doesn't really change anything. Their reputation is so bad that everyone immediately assumes it was intentional and probably a good number of people think it's a lie.
No benefit of the doubt to horrible companies.
Stuff like this makes me want to go out of my way to pirate their stuff, even if it's not good or not my taste.
If only politicians would draw a link between the wars they actually start and gun violence, maybe we could at least have fewer wars....
Absolutely. I kept waiting for the punch line, such as: "The school overreacted and expelled him for posting his grades."
Where's the dirt?
It's so frustrating that these crimes get more serious sentences than rapists and murderers.
The priorities of our society are really disappointing.
Evidently the message Carmen was sending is:
"I have more power than I can responsibly handle and someone desperately needs to rein me in."
Number 1 and 2 are not ironic. Irony means it's unexpected. It's fully expected that someone who eats lots of fatty foods will die of a heart attack. There is nothing ironic about choking on cockroaches, unless it was a fundraiser for raising awareness of the benefits of eating cockroaches or something.
The last one is probably ironic, because he likely advocated for the safety of segways or something.