Looks to me like it's biased in favor of Trump.
I typed in "Donald Trump ch" and failed to get "Donald Trump cheating". In fact, I have to go all the way to "Donald Trump chea" to even get "donald trump cheated architect"...
I think this is more about controlling pricing A movie might be marketed in one country at one rate but priced lower elsewhere.
I watch Netflix or HBO Now or occasionally buy a movie or series from iTunes to watch on my AppleTV.
I do not watch commercial cable television with advertising. Period.
Five minutes of content interlaced with (seemingly) five minutes of ads? And, usually, always the same ads?
Drives me crazy, so I cut the cable TV cord years ago.
Just go with the Hobby Lobby "'agin my religion" defense.
Apple's stance, and the real question, is whether or that this is a lawful request.
A court can issue a warrant to search my premises. They could, potentially, hire someone to attempt to break into my safe. But they don't have the right to go to the manufacturer of that safe and require them to build a device that lets someone else crack the safe they can't figure out how to crack otherwise.
That's judicial overreach.
Sure about that? We have Cox and the Internet-only bill is MUCH less than the cable/internet bundle deal.
Kids in the classroom probably felt the same way about Virginia Tech and Columbine and Aurora.
That's "felt", past tense.
"... the consequences of shooting the wrong person are horrible..."
Not really. You just need to police your shell casings....
http://www.khou.com/story/news/2015/09/27/one-man-injured-after-carjacking-shooting-at-gas-station/72923278/
Was the “gun free zone” a factor in Aurora?
One might note that there was an armed presence at both Columbine and Virginia Tech, and yet those two schools were targeted anyway.
If armed guards are not always a deterrent, would a determined attacker shift targets simply because of the possibility there could be be a civilian with a gun in this particular theater? More to the point, would an attacker wearing a ballistic helmet, body armor, and armed with an assault weapon and two Glock pistols even care?
The assertion that Holmes bypassed the two “closest” theaters specifically to choose the Cinemark is not particularly telling, given that the first was a smaller Hispanic-audience theater and the second a dinner theater.
Nor can we give much weight to the fact that Holmes ignored the “largest” theater in his immediate area. The lack of nearby parking and the constant flow of pedestrians, traffic, and armed patrols around all sides of the building would have made the Harkins a much riskier target.
The Cinemark Century 16, however, was a major theater close to home. It was known. The rear of the building was private and secluded, and Holmes could park just feet away from the theater’s emergency exit.
It was perfect.
http://www.gunfaq.org/2013/04/aurora-and-the-gun-free-zone-theory/
"This was in a gun-free zone."
Sorry, but no. Not only was Umpqua Community College NOT a gun free zone by law, there were also people with guns on campus at the time of the massacre.
But according to reports, by the time one of the individuals with a gun was aware of the shooting, the SWAT team had already responded. Concerned that police would view him as a “bad guy” and target him, so he quickly retreated back into the classroom.
As Oregon is one of seven states that allows concealed carry on postsecondary campuses, you might try getting your facts straight before repeating falsehoods.
You are, however, right about one thing: Sooner or later, public attitude WILL solve this.
Certainly. State tax, county tax, city and municipal taxes. You can even define special tax zones within a city, something commonly done to build yet another sports stadium or arena financed with tax dollars.
"Even O'Reilly himself is now saying things like, "All right, the gay marriage thing, I don't feel that strongly about it one way or the other." If that troglodyte can evolve can't you?"
He didn't evolve. He just finds it advantageous to not stick his neck out. Rest assured, if O'Reilly thought the wind was in his favor, we'd still be hearing about turtles.
The 9% tax on cloud-based infrastructure is the larger issue.
No fun questions whatsoever. Is the billing address in Chicago? How about the card used to pay for the services? If so, done and done.
Which doesn't stop it -- especially the internet services part -- from being exceedingly stupid.
Worse, taxing internet services only impacts smaller businesses and startups, as any larger company or corporation will simply setup things so that any services paid for are done elsewhere.
Can you say "shortsighted" and "stupid" boys and girls?
Local businesses need to pay local and state sales taxes because they use and depend on roads, water, gas, police, fire departments, and other local infrastructure. Internet-based businesses do not.
Now, Amazon does, in fact, ship things to you... via trucks owned by shipping companies that pay local taxes, and via trucks licensed locally, and fueled locally.
IOW, that local FedEx warehouse pays property taxes and income taxes. The truck driving down your street is licensed and pays excise taxes. The gas in it is taxed. And so on.
In short, those trucks that are still "using the roads" have already paid to do so, and taxing them twice over makes no sense at all.
And then there's...
Comcast users in various parts of the country have already gotten (or may soon get) a lovely holiday present from their ISP—a seemingly inexplicable increase in the cable modem rental fee, from $8 to $10 per month.
arstechnica.com/business/2014/12/comcast-just-upped-its-cable-modem-rental-fee-from-8-to-10-per-month/
Apparently a 12-month "contract" is no such thing whatsoever.
Apple's iOS has a little known feature called "guided access" which you can use to lock a phone to a single running app.
So potentially you could pull up the app, lock it, and hand your phone over and the only thing they could see is that app.
The point is that Apple Pay is built on Visa's and Mastercard's standard, not Apple's.
Or do "standards" not count unless they're "open".
Re:
I cut over two years ago, and while I still watch some TV, almost all of it comes from Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Now (total cost: $37/mo).
Occasionally when I'm on a trip I'll turn on the TV in the hotel room and try to watch "normal" television, with all of the ads and crawlers and interstitials and interrupters... and I wonder just who would be dumb enough to pay over $100/mo for that kind of abuse.