Couldn't they do this same attack with a very elaborate emulator? All they could need is the 1:1 NAND from the phone, and just attack it through the emulator. Replacing the attacked copy after the attacks with a fresh one and start over?
Though i'm not denying what you or the article says, Why are they instructing their telephone operators to categorically refuse to answer the question of support? If the guy on the phone has said what their twitter said I would have been more reassured about their position than "I did some research on your question and have been informed to refuse to answer it"
Couldn't they do this same attack with a very elaborate emulator? All they could need is the 1:1 NAND from the phone, and just attack it through the emulator. Replacing the attacked copy after the attacks with a fresh one and start over?
Source for quote
"Understandably, people would be concerned," the president said. "I would be, too, if I weren't inside the government."
I can't find a video of him saying this. Is it a paraphrase of the entire speech, or did he ACTUALLY say this? Where is the source?
Re: Re: $500K on "Intellectual property issues" in 2011 for...what?
Though i'm not denying what you or the article says, Why are they instructing their telephone operators to categorically refuse to answer the question of support? If the guy on the phone has said what their twitter said I would have been more reassured about their position than "I did some research on your question and have been informed to refuse to answer it"
Keep going!
Keep up the good work Mike!
SOPA/PIPA bypasses your "Rule 65" you coward. If not, offer proof and i'll eat crow.