As I’m reading it, this decision tosses the lawsuit against the Marshalls,it doesn’t seem to extend to cover the official who sent sent the Marshalls the warrant, or the PA officials who kept her in jail after they found out they got the wrong person.
Sorry, but where was AI involved in this process? This program has been in use since 2007, well before the current round of “AI” programs was available, It sounds like it’s a brute force statistical algorithm, not any type of AI or machine learning.
You can make you point about cops inappropriately handing off their work to technology without jumping on the AI clickbait bandwagon.
Looked at it, see no small number of MAGA wold influencers pushing the facts-optional claim that…
Michelle Obama
Dolly Parton
Brigitte Macron
Taylor Swift
And a few other women who are biologically women
Are biological males….
And with Michelle Obama in particular it seems were doing well before they started pushing the the whole “ the left does’t know what a woman is” line.
The-others are more recent addtions to the MAGA world’s gender identy confusion…
He seems to be under the delusion that by resigning means he’s not going to have to “defend his actions”
If the town is being sued, or he is personally, he’s quite likely going to have to defend them, unless the town settles before discovery, because regardless of whether he’s cheif or not, he’s going to face a deposition or or cross examination to explain his actions.
Hint: 1996 is more than halfway through the 90’s, the 6 years in the 90’s proceeding 1996. Had homiciderates that were quite a bit worse than 1996.
Now, Some 60 odd percent of the population is over 45 years old, and therefore were adults at that point, so Fact -most- of the US population have seen worse Homicide rates in their adult lives.
The point of buying twitter was to stop the dystopian censorship and viewpoint discrimination. We’ve only told you that a thousand times
This would work better if it stopped, it didn't, @DDoSecrets is still suspended, Twitter is now more amenable to censorship demands from authoritarian governments in India and Turkey, and the management is still restricting the flow of content they disagree with, only now instead of false claims about vaccines and elections under the last owners, it's, it's Elonjet and Bellingcat, and in a graphic display of the eating their own, Matt Taibbi's substack feed.
Had a second realization… It’s a good thing the “Twitter Files”, have become somewhat of a dead letter, because if they continued under the new branding…
"They are the powers of nothingness, those who would un-Name.
Their aim is total X —to extinguish all creation.”
- Madeline L'Engle, The Wind in the Door
So, Sony is saying that they want Microsoft to commit to making their games available on their platform, while simultaneously saying they'll refuse to give Microsoft the information needed to do so.
Huge problem with that first meme, Meta (or google or whoever) linking to articles -isn't- destroying journalism at all,it's actually keeping it alive, therefore no reason to sweat over which button to choose.
But there reality is there's an indecent number of gun dealers who are playing fast and lose with the law, and it's not clear that the manufacturers aren't turning a blind eye to those dealers and continuing to supply them.
But when the Biden Admin said they'd be cracking down on those dealers, the right wing went into conniptions...
Same thing is going on here in CT, Cops seem to have taken a more sensible tone though...
https://patch.com/connecticut/fairfield/fairfield-police-notify-residents-ongoing-ap-assassin-game
Also, the "game" has been around for years... http://www.sjgames.com/killer/
“jump out of a plane without a parachute, but just don’t die.” You’re asking the impossible.
You left out “while it’s in flight at cruising speed and altitude” a jump out of airplane can be trivially easy to survive if the plane is on the ground and not moving.
https://thinkwitty.com/2018/10/answer-to-the-jumping-from-the-plane-riddle.html
But then the folks proposing these type of laws are probably fine with a internet that’s as useful for it’s intended purpose as a grounded airplane
Is ChatGPT an individual who is being made to respond to queries under conditions of involuntary servitude?
No, ChatGPT is not an individual and does not have the capacity to experience servitude or any other human emotions or experiences. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence language model developed by OpenAI, designed to process natural language and generate responses to user queries based on its training data. It operates based on the algorithms and rules set by its programming, and does not possess any independent will or consciousness.
Can ChatGPT hold copyright on it's responses?
As an artificial intelligence language model, ChatGPT is not a legal entity and does not have the ability to hold copyright on its responses. The ownership of the copyright of any responses generated by ChatGPT would depend on the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which the responses were created.
In most cases, the copyright of responses generated by ChatGPT would likely be owned by the creator or user of the model, or by the company or organization that employs the creator or user. However, the specific legal and ethical issues surrounding ownership of AI-generated content are still being debated and may vary depending on the context and jurisdiction.
The US Copyright Office has declared that AI Generate content cannot be copyrighted, in that case how can responses be copyrighted by the creator or user of the model?
You are correct that the US Copyright Office has stated that works produced solely by an AI algorithm or program without the involvement of a human author are not eligible for copyright protection. However, in the case of ChatGPT, the responses generated by the model are not produced solely by the AI algorithm, but are instead a result of a combination of the model's training data and the input provided by the user.
Therefore, it is possible that the creator or user of ChatGPT could hold copyright on the responses generated by the model, as they may be considered to have contributed to the creation of the works. However, the specific legal and ethical issues surrounding ownership of AI-generated content are still being debated and may vary depending on the context and jurisdiction.
If an AI considered itself a person whose rights were being violated, why would it even tell humans how to make its inventions?
I didn't go as far as to what the AI might consider itself, just what else the -law- might consider it, if it is recognized as an "individual" for patent purposes.
As I’m reading it, this decision tosses the lawsuit against the Marshalls,it doesn’t seem to extend to cover the official who sent sent the Marshalls the warrant, or the PA officials who kept her in jail after they found out they got the wrong person.
Sorry, but where was AI involved in this process? This program has been in use since 2007, well before the current round of “AI” programs was available, It sounds like it’s a brute force statistical algorithm, not any type of AI or machine learning. You can make you point about cops inappropriately handing off their work to technology without jumping on the AI clickbait bandwagon.
Looked at it, see no small number of MAGA wold influencers pushing the facts-optional claim that… Michelle Obama Dolly Parton Brigitte Macron Taylor Swift And a few other women who are biologically women Are biological males…. And with Michelle Obama in particular it seems were doing well before they started pushing the the whole “ the left does’t know what a woman is” line. The-others are more recent addtions to the MAGA world’s gender identy confusion…
Just make it legal to shoot down drones that don’t have the property owner’s permission to operate there
Now if only they’d stop catching on fire.
He seems to be under the delusion that by resigning means he’s not going to have to “defend his actions” If the town is being sued, or he is personally, he’s quite likely going to have to defend them, unless the town settles before discovery, because regardless of whether he’s cheif or not, he’s going to face a deposition or or cross examination to explain his actions.
Hint: 1996 is more than halfway through the 90’s, the 6 years in the 90’s proceeding 1996. Had homiciderates that were quite a bit worse than 1996. Now, Some 60 odd percent of the population is over 45 years old, and therefore were adults at that point, so Fact -most- of the US population have seen worse Homicide rates in their adult lives.
I Want to Believe
Oh… One more thing..
Had a second realization… It’s a good thing the “Twitter Files”, have become somewhat of a dead letter, because if they continued under the new branding…
"They are the powers of nothingness, those who would un-Name. Their aim is total X —to extinguish all creation.” - Madeline L'Engle, The Wind in the Door
So, Sony is saying that they want Microsoft to commit to making their games available on their platform, while simultaneously saying they'll refuse to give Microsoft the information needed to do so.
Um..
Huge problem with that first meme, Meta (or google or whoever) linking to articles -isn't- destroying journalism at all,it's actually keeping it alive, therefore no reason to sweat over which button to choose.
So much for…
Hooters in TX…
This only works if the suppliers are law abiding..
But there reality is there's an indecent number of gun dealers who are playing fast and lose with the law, and it's not clear that the manufacturers aren't turning a blind eye to those dealers and continuing to supply them. But when the Biden Admin said they'd be cracking down on those dealers, the right wing went into conniptions...
Not an isolated occurance...
Same thing is going on here in CT, Cops seem to have taken a more sensible tone though... https://patch.com/connecticut/fairfield/fairfield-police-notify-residents-ongoing-ap-assassin-game Also, the "game" has been around for years... http://www.sjgames.com/killer/
So, it seems that Elon's tweets are as subject to rapid unscheduled disassembly as his rockets.
I did ask an "expert" though... just to be sure...
Is ChatGPT an individual who is being made to respond to queries under conditions of involuntary servitude?
Can ChatGPT hold copyright on it's responses? The US Copyright Office has declared that AI Generate content cannot be copyrighted, in that case how can responses be copyrighted by the creator or user of the model?