The reputed Congressional Ethics Office was a farce, wrapped in a joke, girdled by K-Y jelly. It never even had subpoena power. In fact it had no power whatsoever.
Pelosi made sure of that. Just one example amongst the many is Charles Rangel.
The FBI, the NSA and other agencies seem to be less than capable of doing their jobs. Perhaps it is time to either give them a budget of $0. Or to replace them with with the KeyStone Kops, who at least managed to run around in circles.
Why don't people simply accept that we live in a police state?
It sounds a little steep, but the Federal penalty for a single wiretap can be five years in jail, and a $250K fine.
Feds do thousands of illicit wire taps, sell thousands of weapons to known criminal mobs, distribute a million or more new images of pedophilia not previously seen, violate innumerable laws on torture and endlessly break other laws.
Local law enforcement gets away with every crime in the book. From littering to murder, larceny to rape, perjury to torture. Jundges often refuse to look at video tapes of cops committing crimes.
When laws are equally enforced, when punishments are equal (they really should be higher for LEOs, but I will settle for equal) then we can talk about calming down.
Can anyone explain why an NDA is legally superior to a court order, or a defense team subpoena. I have asked this question in a number of places, but never have gotten an answer.
And one of the most incredibly incompetent and useless US agencies -- HSA -- wants to take over cyber security for our nation.
I have a patent on the use of the mouth for, but not limited to,speaking, spitting, eating, sucking on a straw, chewing, osculating, cunnilingus, fellatio and all other discovered and undiscovered. I also have a patent on the use of hands, fingers, and toes for any and all types of communication including keyboarding.
It is therefor illegal for any person to have communicated the putative cart paten cart patent into law, or for any other purpose.
I guess I have to go back to putting a /sarcasm at the end of my postings, or perhaps there really is an interest in such videos..
The knowledge that a person goes to into a jewelry story, visits a doctor, sees a lawyer, etc is potentially harmful in the wrong hands. An SO may ask why did you go to the MD, see a divorce lawyer, or go into a jewelry store? Or anyone who can get possession of such videos (including LEOS) may use them for blackmail.
The knew or should have known standard should apply to the professional members of the legal system even more so than the average citizen. I wouldn't say one strike and you are out, but there has to be a limit.
I may be just guessing, but there had to be some citizen, perhaps a clerk or mailboy who knew and understood what 230 meant.
The entertainment world will mutate the web into a the same sorrowful and boring mess that the rest of the "extravaganzas" are, and all cords coming into the home will be cut.
The real purpose of these laws is to provide police, DAs, ADAs and Councilmen access to videos of children being examined in Pediatricians offices. The rest of the business's are simply collateral damage.
Would you be so kind as to explain which bitter lods you are referring to. I tried looking it up, but just got acronyms.
It is not just the FBI, but every branch and action of government. Except of course, for those feelgood exploits like cutting a ribbon for the installation of a playground or serving a Thanksgiving meal to the poor.
The mess ship has sailed. At least one company that will go unnamed has blatantly refused to fix known bugs in a lighting system that leaves other systems in the residence wide open to crackers.
I certainly have strong beliefs about never sending a person where you can send an electron (paraphrased from J Edgar Hoover.) But just how much loss of security is voice control worth in the turning on a light? Especially when there are other, safe ways of doing this than by means which expose your digital life?
Hillary's hubris should result in punishment. Although it was not totally irrational to think that just about anyone could put up a more secure mail server than systems developed by the US government.
But so many have committed equal or worse crimes in this line of villainy, and suffered far less for their misdeeds.
Sorry to say, but TD has already passed his peak of maturity, and is falling with rapidly increasing jerk (third derivative of position, it is the change is acceleration.) Actually, he is obviously experiencing a rapidly increasing drop (8th derivative,) the mathematical term of jerk probably gets the message across better to those not familiar with calculus.
Right you are. Left and Right (Liberal and Conservative) are as meaningful as sports team names, or red and blue teams in steal the flag. They serve as poles of attraction to which individuals are drawn by assignment or popularity. Once attracted to a pole, the camouflage required to remain in that locale means adopting a "platform." How can anyone in their right mind take on the talking points in any such doctrine? Even the Constitution has its flaws.
I was once described as a libertarian, socialist, strict constructionist. It is an appellation that I am proud of, in that it means that I think for myself rather than follow a butting order of bovines around.
A decidedly defusing statement might be:
"I would have to agree, that is what you espouse."
That is criminal intent. Civilians have gone to jail for less.
I would like to see the buying public go on strike, and refuse to buy any more "entertainment" until that industry uses its considerable political power to cause the copyright law back to what it was in the original constitution.
Until that happens, the only change will be for the worse. If the public continues to act upon their addiction, then they deserve what they get.