Seems to me it would be far more helpful, for both Amazon and authors, if blatantly irrelevant reviews were deleted. The most obvious example of these are the widespread one-stars that complain about shipping, returns, or some other unrelated problem.
If I were an author, I'd be much more concerned by books being down-rated for reasons irrelevant to the content than by books being up-rated because the writer needed to buy a good review.
It's not that Congress doesn't realize what it's doing and saying, it's that Congress realizes that most voters aren't paying attention.
Free i-named pad computing device manufactured by a major fruit-flavored technology company.
Wow. More clueless than my great-grandpa. That's an achievement, AC/DC.
If there's simply no reasonable way to calculate actual damages, maybe there's no actual damage.
"the effect of monopoly generally is to make articles scarce, to make them dear, and to make them bad."In my RSS feed, immediately after this quote is an ad for Microsoft Windows.
It IS a brilliant business strategy ? if you're a lawyer.
I have no doubt some law firms are busily marketin themselves in this newfound legal speciality, and no doubt that content producers are lapping it up as a way to extend their revenues.
As long as the lawyers aren't taking more than 99%, producers could see it as a win. And no matter if there's negative publicity ? lawsuits come after the big splash, when income is waning anyway, and they can just form new production or distribution company for the next one.
When will these industries realize that WE have a window too?
In my case I call it my "give a shit window." If the music/movie/TV biz can't manage to lob their content through my moving, sometimes narrow window -- in the form I want it it, from Omnimax to iPhone to DVD with Dolby Surround -- then they lose.
Sorry. Better luck next time. Oh wait, this IS "next time."
It's no problem to pay money or see advertising -- I'm glad support artists and performers I enjoy -- but if the material isn't there, ready, in the right format, without hassles... Well there are plenty of other options that respect my time and attention.
Heck, these days just podcasts and friends' (very good) music is enough to keep me away from TV and movies and radio for months at a time.
See ya around, content industry! Write if you find relevance.
I was a paying subscriber. The value wasn't in the content per se, of course I could get that on my computer or phone.
The value was in the ink delivered to my door every morning. I could take it on the train, through the tunnel, without wifi or 3G or a battery, without stopping to stand in line. I'd leave it lying on the table at work, fueling interesting conversations with colleagues over lunch. Most days, my Times was read by two or three people.
Within reason, I didn't care what home delivery cost. I was paying to have instant, shareable news around all day -- until delivery became unreliable. The NYT quit selling what I was buying.
Next stop: "Pirated" copies, released via the producers indirectly, to drive the lawsuit revenue stream.
No need for distribution contracts, theaters, DVDs, or that Dolby stuff -- just seed a torrent and hire a grip of lawyers.
...trademarks aren't handed out so freely.
The government doth protest too much for the purpose of diverting attention.
As more of the newsy-go-round is devoted to Wikileaks, less is devoted to the leaks themselves, the outrageous policy hypocrisy some illustrate, or unveiling our government's deep and shadowy marriage of state and corporate interests.
US corporatocracy depends on people not thinking for themselves. It's a very successful tactic.
Leave it to the movie biz to stage a protracted, fitful, overly dramatic death scene.
Spray paint the accused's name on the side of Barrister Caldicott's home, then threaten him with legal action for announcing the name.
If Caldicott still doesn't get it, Australia has facilities where people with conditions like his can receive developmental therapy.
We can help the friendly telcos by making sure their generous, customer-oriented billing practices get lots of publicity.
They're wily fsckers, you have to give them that...
Going after mostly porn infringement (for now) effectively casts any opposition as "pro-porn." It will be hard for those accused (legitimately or not) to rouse much sympathy.
Later, armed with a stack of precedents, they'll be ready to file lawsuits over the more mainstream adaptations of Barbie Horse Adventures.
It will be interesting to see which congress-critters jump onboard to sponsor this sort of legislation, then rush home to froth about government over-regulation and interference with business.
It's SAAPP
First we had Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.
Now we have Strategic Arrest Against Public Participation.