Gabriel Tane's Favorites Of The Week: Censorship At Home And Abroad
This week’s list of “favorite” posts of the week is handed off to Gabriel Tane
Friends! Countrymen! Techdirt-ians! Lend me your… eyes! It’s my turn to stroke my ego and pretend that anyone cares to hear what I have to say about issues. But, if you’re still reading (and keep on reading), then I’ll assume you’re at least interested. So, read on and thanks for your attention.
First up, we’ll start with a whole slew of related articles that show how the DHS/ICE domain seizures have some serious questions that need some answers. This week, we’ve seen stories that discuss what does the situation mean to our international relations. The question of jurisdiction has been batted around in the comments as a matter of technicality, but not a lot was said about how far-reaching of an effect this may have if other countries decide they don’t like how we seem to be rather bully-ish about how our laws are more important than others’. I don’t know the answer to that question, but since our actions so far have been to pull our plug out and thumb our noses, I don’t think I want to know the effect.
Further, we’ve seen where the technical understanding and legality have been called into question by more than just bloggers and interested lawyers. Now, have the questions been raised in such a way that will force the hand of DHS/ICE? Probably not; but the fact that so many people are raising their eyebrows about it means there is something going on that needs to be looked at. And it will, sooner than later I hope.
Second, I also got quite interested in the patent-vs-innovation article that was posted. It seems that the status-quo is being questioned even by those “inside” the system. In a very broad way, I wonder how long until actual common sense is going to win over the juggernaut of established bureaucracy. Hmm…
Third, I was very interested to hear about the situation in Egypt. Actually, I heard about it here first. I didn’t follow it completely and thoroughly, but I did have a face-palm moment at this story about the timing of American legislation that people said included an “internet kill switch.” I was worried about someone posting comments from a tin-foil fort about how Egypt was some kind of warning about what would happen if the US increased its censorship… and here comes the government showing how such a claim wouldn’t be too far of a stretch. sigh. At least China was worried about the implications.
Further on the face-palm front… I was glad to see the TSA getting a clue with new scanners that don’t show you naked, and realizing the people who write the paychecks are not happy with their actions — and not surprised to see them completely ignore the need for effective screening that actually does something other than justify a paycheck.
Fourth and finally, ain’t technology grand!? Seeing Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric discover the internet was fun. Now, much like the rest of you, I found this to be an amusing view on how technology has grown and how silly we see ourselves then, 20+ years later. I was, again like most of you, sadly not surprised when a major news corp followed this up by completely overreacting to the situation, firing the person responsible and, thus, creating the much-loved Streisand-effect. I wonder how long it’s going to take before the reality of the internet’s openness and, well, immortality sinks in to the people who think they can just wish information away.
There were so many fun stories this week, I know I didn’t get them all covered. I think I covered the ones that echo strongest with me: the fact that our government seems to want to censor what’s on the internet (arguably, at the beck and call of the entertainment industry) while another country (our ally?) faces some very serious consequences for that very action.
I think we’ve seen the start of a trend towards people wanting real answers to what’s going on. I know that as I read the comments from both sides (at least, those on either side that choose to provide data), I learn more and more about how these things do and should work. For that, I would like to take a purely-selfish moment and thank all the commenters — regulars, ACs, insiders and outsiders — for helping me broaden my knowledge about the world around me.
And, of course, I do so love to see how far technology has come in the last few years… and if anyone wants some authentic AOL coasters, let me know ;).
Re: Re: Re: Word play
Yeeeeeup. Welcome to the dog & pony show of "here, have the choice we give you" illusion of our government at work.
Anyone else notice that the 'other option' of the current administration seems to be a constant train-wreck of a contest to see who can be bat-shit crazier, thereby getting more people to vote Obama back in again? Almost like someone out there wants to keep the status-quo as long as possible?
"hey everyone... look how craaaazy your other options are! A bunch of nutty bible-beating scary's! Those would be much worse than a Kenyan Socialist Commie!"
Now go cast that vote which has never mattered because your election isn't based on the general popular majority and is instead based on the Electoral College and this whole Primary Party Vote and one candidate-per-party thing is not listed anywhere in the constitution. But never mind that! vote vote vote!!! You're an American hating TERRORIST who not only doesn't support our troops, but actively causes them to DIE if you don't vote. And you hate puppies.
Crap. Dropped my tinfoil hat.
INB4
hurr hurr sounds like Hed is drinking Maznik's kool-aid.
Sorry... feeling plucky today. I like the fact that there's yet another example (because, you know, it won't work for everyone) of how you can turn piracy into a boon. And make a great success at it as well.
My example: Shared my copy w/ my two girls... Cost Rovio what? $20? $30? Now they both snatch up Angry Birds Merch wherever they can. Already paid Rovio over $100 last year alone.
Win!
Re: Re: Re:
Considering the "we know what's best for you" and "it's for your own good" attitudes of the corporations and the general disparity in wealth and (subsequent) power... your analogy is, sadly, rather accurate.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It struck me the other day...
Compared to Twilight: a by-the-book "clumsy heroin must work to be with the one she loves... oh and there are vampires and werewolves in it" story? One that describes the main character so vaguely that it magically is a perfect match for EVERY girl age 12 to 25 who is insecure with themselves (read: practically all of them)?
I think they're both crap... each for different but equally vapid reasons.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Okay...
You: "Hollywood is innovative"
Me: "No they're not... show this innovation"
You: "Well, neither was Silicon Valley!"
Do I need to point out the argument fail there?
Re:
I'd settle for a 2nd Funny button... one that means "so stupid/sad/idiot that it's funny".
Re: Re: The List
I've got an image of a caveman in a Flintstones 3-piece suit paining a ICE Seizure notice over a caveman's painting that too closely resembles the stick-figure-and-smudging representation of a wooly mammoth hunt that Grug painted over on that cave wall.
Re: Re:
Wait... Was I asleep at some point in this last decade where a new movie was actually made? All I saw was remakes, adaptations and horrible abominations that should remain nameless (hint: some include giant robots that change into cars and surviving nuclear detonations in a fridge).
So, where are these new stories?
As Katt Williams says: "Don't worry... I'll wait"
Re: and all the princess movies:
I've heard all of that before, but it is very interesting to see it listed. Thanks!
Re: Hit it on the head, possibly not like they thought
I think they meant that they are the group that is fighting the established monopoly to create a distribution system that the people want, whereas the established monopoly is exactly that (a monopoly) and holds a belief in a moral stand.
I don't think TPB meant that they were making the movies.
But if you continue their line of reasoning, what they're wanting to do is turn the whole world into Hollywood... where anyone can not only make a movie, but get it distributed without being mired down under the legal muscle of a vastly over-inflated beast.
Re: Re: Re: It struck me the other day...
The problem with that is, for the most part, they're not wrong. Look at the lines of people to get in to the latest orgy of idiocy in the Twilight saga[sic]. They keep churning out the same crap year after year, and/or repackaging (read: raping) the classics we grew up with... and people. keep. going.
Sounds to me like they know a winning thing when they see it.
Me? I haven't been to the theater in a while. Haven't bought a DVD in a while either. I do, however, love my "goofy movies from the 80's" list and the like on NetFlix.
Re: Re:
Kinda like making a relationship with the girl who cheated on her boyfriend to be with you... it happened before, you know it'll happen again. But hey, she's cute, so you'll just pretend that somehow this time is special and history won't repeat itself.
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Oh, I missed the hyphen...
Anal-iaze.
Thanks for catching that ;)
Re: A matter of priorities
That would be because a comedian can look at the situation and make his observations... Congress has spent this time tying to analize it and find further interpretations of the situation to justify thier working on the behalf of big business instead of the people they're supposed to work for... you know, us
who's fault?
Did I miss something? Is it a review of bad service that ruined my reputation... or the actual bad service that generated the review?
Is this just another example of shifting the blame and shirking responsibility?
Re: Re: Yay for word of the day.
my vote is for "Nearly-Infinitely Dark Helmet"
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22403016086/did-few-million-virtual-monkeys-randomly-recreate-shakespeare-not-really.shtml#c1107
Idea vs Expression
Does the EU copyright have the same "you can patent the expression of an idea, but not the idea itself" thing that we do? Or do they have it and they're ignoring it like we do?
Re:
Nice creatively-selective definition of "enable"... Or, as you put it, tap-dancing weasel wording. Not all 'enabling' is simple 'allowing it to happen'.
For example: I work for a major insurance company who was, and still is, a major player in the Agent business model. When the Great Big Interweb came along and our competitors started trying to say "see, you can buy it here, no need for agents!", we shifted what our agents do. Now, they enable the purchase of insurance by providing additional value to the purchase. By answering questions and offering guidance on what and how much to purchase, these enablers are able to make the purchase a better experience for the customer.
In this sense, 'enabler' isn't necessarily the dry, dictionary definition, but the 'marketing power word' that means "the people who assist in getting prospects to become customers by giving value to the experience"... which is exactly what the article is talking about.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Jan: "Freetard" month
Feb: "Broadbrush" month
Mar: "Kool-Aid" month
Apr: "Sycophant" month
May: "jackwagon" month
June - Dec: ???
Re: Re: Re: Re: "Pirate Mike"
From what I'm reading, the judge is arguing the same thing as Mike... that the original purpose of copyright was to promote progress. The judge doesn't say anything about whether this is still applicable.